On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 20:20, Regis Boudin wrote:
...
> Anyway, I'm quite keen to make an upload, though a quick double check
> before I do would be welcome.
...
I don't feel confortable enough with debconf to double check it but I
do want to thank your commitment to this. Awesome work :)
--
O
And, after a small delay, I believe I now have cdebconf in a pretty
interesting state in git.
I followed Joey's suggestion to copy the original debconf files to the
location cdebconf would expect to find them, with symlinks. I added the
creation of some backup files, and made the moving conditiona
Hi guys,
Just to let you know, I've done some work on it, had some real life stuff
to deal with, and hit some technical issue, but I believe I just found
what was my last blocking problem, so I'm now expecting to push a working
version during the weekend.
Regis
On Thu, October 6, 2011 16:30, Reg
Hi Joey,
On Thu, October 6, 2011 16:07, Joey Hess wrote:
> Regis Boudin wrote:
>> * debconf/frontend: debconf and cdebconf have different names for the
>> frontends (Readline, Dialog, Gnome, versus text, newt, gtk), which
>> causes
>> all sorts of issues for the transition. Any objection to using
Regis Boudin wrote:
> * debconf/frontend: debconf and cdebconf have different names for the
> frontends (Readline, Dialog, Gnome, versus text, newt, gtk), which causes
> all sorts of issues for the transition. Any objection to using
> cdebconf/frontend instead ?
Not really, but the rest of d-i wo
Hi guys,
So, unfortunately for you, I'm still working on cdebconf. I've fixed a
couple of issues, though I would like some feedback before pushing some
other changes I have.
* debconf/frontend: debconf and cdebconf have different names for the
frontends (Readline, Dialog, Gnome, versus text, new
6 matches
Mail list logo
