Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> On Monday 01 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > To be even more efficient, I wonder if there's a possibility to
> > download list archives as a mailbox. That would make spam tagging more
> > efficient than going through the web interface.
>
> scp maste
Il giorno lun, 01/06/2009 alle 20.28 +0200, Christian Perrier ha
scritto:
> With the web interface, I found a quite fast way to move around
> archives already, particularly when there's a big bunch of successive
> spams. That works with Konqueror:
>
> Click on first spam
> Tab, quickly read the fi
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> Only works for DDs obviously. Disadvantage is that this archive will still
> have all spam that's already been removed...
> I'm sticking with the web interface myself.
Thanks. I'll make a few trys. It's probably OK to use the mailbox for
the "first" revi
On Monday 01 June 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> To be even more efficient, I wonder if there's a possibility to
> download list archives as a mailbox. That would make spam tagging more
> efficient than going through the web interface.
scp master.debian.org:~debian/lists/debian-boot/debian-boot.
Il giorno lun, 01/06/2009 alle 08.59 +0200, Christian Perrier ha
scritto:
> Could you do 2008/08 to 2009/01? These are the most recent ones that
> still have "only" 4 reviews 2007/08 to 2007/12 are also good
> targets.
OK, I'm going to review them today.
> Stefano, also don't forget about inc
Quoting Stefano Canepa (s...@linux.it):
> I started with 2006/01, added my nick into the table on the wiki.
Could you do 2008/08 to 2009/01? These are the most recent ones that
still have "only" 4 reviews 2007/08 to 2007/12 are also good
targets.
Stefano, also don't forget about increasing
Il giorno dom, 31/05/2009 alle 19.51 +0200, Frans Pop ha scritto:
> On Sunday 31 May 2009, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> > Il giorno dom, 17/05/2009 alle 06.29 +0200, Frans Pop ha scritto:
> > > Current status can be seen on:
> > > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
> > >
> > > Additional h
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 17/05/2009 alle 06.29 +0200, Frans Pop ha scritto:
> > Current status can be seen on:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
> >
> > Additional help to scan the archive and nominate posts is always
> > welcome.
>
> I can do
Il giorno dom, 17/05/2009 alle 06.29 +0200, Frans Pop ha scritto:
...
> Current status can be seen on:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean
>
> Additional help to scan the archive and nominate posts is always welcome.
I can do some work, tell me which month needs more help.
Bye
St
Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
> Hi,
>
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I found interesting to see that among months I recently worked on,
> > September 2007 had a huge amount of spam (including a terrible spam
> > storm in the middle of the month), August 2007 has a fairly high
Hi,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> I found interesting to see that among months I recently worked on,
> September 2007 had a huge amount of spam (including a terrible spam
> storm in the middle of the month), August 2007 has a fairly high
> number, bit May, June and July had nearly no spam at all.
D
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> On Sunday 17 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Sunday 03 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > I'm looking forward to a cleaner archive! If we share the workload a
> > > bit, that should be possible.
> >
> > We now have a solid team working on this and if we keep
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 03 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I'm looking forward to a cleaner archive! If we share the workload a
> > bit, that should be possible.
>
> We now have a solid team working on this and if we keep this up it
> looks that in 4 or 5 weeks we can hav
Quoting Cord Beermann (c...@debian.org):
> Hallo! Du (Christian Perrier) hast geschrieben:
>
> > A few enhancements I would propose to listmasters (or anyone behind
> > the review tool):
> >
> > - have a display mode for the list archives where messages already
> > "nominated" would be shown in a
Hallo! Du (Christian Perrier) hast geschrieben:
> A few enhancements I would propose to listmasters (or anyone behind
> the review tool):
>
> - have a display mode for the list archives where messages already
> "nominated" would be shown in a different way (maybe sorting messages
> by number of s
(cleaning spam in debian-boot: see
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SpamClean)
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> have been done. This has already resulted in 676 spams being removed from
> the archive and for this week another 650 posts are waiting for review.
Done this morning. No
On Sunday 03 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> I'm looking forward to a cleaner archive! If we share the workload a
> bit, that should be possible.
First of all: many thanks for the great response to this RFH!
Progress on the review of the archive has been huge. Since the start over
11,000 nomination
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > OK, starting to go through the review process...I guess you will go
> > through it as well.
>
> Well, I'm already done...
> Think I had 1 or 2 ham messages.
I'm done too, finished yesterday. I confirm there was 1 or 2 ham
messages, that's all.
sign
On Sunday 10 May 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > Well, they are updated now while they were not yet updated yesterday.
> > I'll let you draw your own conclusions from that ;-)
> >
> > 233 messages removed so far and 700 new messages available for
> > revi
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> Well, they are updated now while they were not yet updated yesterday. I'll
> let you draw your own conclusions from that ;-)
>
> 233 messages removed so far and 700 new messages available for review...
Ouch...we worked too well.
OK, starting to go thro
On Sunday 10 May 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> > Note that the "review batch job" (including actual removals, updating
> > "messages to be reviewed" and review statistics) is only run once a
> > week.
>
> Any idea when this is run?
Well, they are updated
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> Note that the "review batch job" (including actual removals, updating
> "messages to be reviewed" and review statistics) is only run once a week.
Any idea when this is run?
Since the moment (a few days ago) where some months reached mentions
on the wiki p
On Saturday 09 May 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
> > Hi,
> >
> > Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > From my own experience, it's fairly easy to "miss" spams in the
> > > lists of messages, so we really needs a few more people (about 1 or
> > > 2, I
Hi,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Unless Frans has another advice, I'd suggest concentrating on months
> that haven't had 5 reviews already.
Ath the moment there are only two months which had already 5 (or more)
reviews.
Holger
--
==
Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):
> Hi,
>
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > From my own experience, it's fairly easy to "miss" spams in the lists
> > of messages, so we really needs a few more people (about 1 or 2, I
> > think) to go through the archives.
>
> I want to help here.
>
Hi,
Christian Perrier wrote:
> From my own experience, it's fairly easy to "miss" spams in the lists
> of messages, so we really needs a few more people (about 1 or 2, I
> think) to go through the archives.
I want to help here.
I will start at April 2009 and go backwards to the past
(will docume
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> Well, new messages will be nominated all the time, especially if enough
> people respond to this RFH.
As of now, there seem to be 5 people working on the initial step
(identify spam in list archives): fjp philbat bubulle fp dww.
That just enough to bring
On Monday 04 May 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > 2) this then needs to be reviewed by multiple DDs (using the new
> > tools)
>
> Is there a way, with that step, to know *how many* left messages there
> are?
The page where you select a mailing list shows how many nominated messages
there are to
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
> The removal of spam gets done in three stages:
I started working on this yesterday (apparently a few others have
also, which is good).
I did a little bit of:
> 1) a spam message needs to be reported by multiple people (using the
>"Report as spam" but
Hi all,
Yes, I do mean all: D-I team, D-I users, lurkers, everybody!
Now that the listmasters have created a working toolset to actually remove
spam from the mailing list archives [1], it seems like a good idea to
make a coordinated effort to clean spam from the list archives.
The removal of s
30 matches
Mail list logo
