On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 06:17:32PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
> About the udebs, I agree that would be better to have a message on
> Debian Boot mailing list about them, before asking for them to be
> build but I also think that noone need to know about that. We ought
> write it on Developer
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 13 July 2007 21:38, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> The only "risk" I see, is the udeb Package file be coming fat. D-I won't
>> fetch udebs it doesn't need, so no harm, no conflicts, no problems.
>
> Apparently you are having problems understanding my ar
On Friday 13 July 2007 21:38, Geert Stappers wrote:
> The only "risk" I see, is the udeb Package file be coming fat. D-I won't
> fetch udebs it doesn't need, so no harm, no conflicts, no problems.
Apparently you are having problems understanding my arguments. Please read
my earlier mails again.
>
> OK, so basically the only reason is that the regular fdisk and cfdisk do
> not support GPT partition tables?
>
> In that case, I think we should _not_ add these udebs, for the following
> reasons:
> - we already have parted-udeb, which I expect _does_ support GPT
> - the new udebs conflict
4 matches
Mail list logo
