Christian Perrier, le Mon 06 Jul 2009 07:15:45 +0200, a écrit :
> > Why not? Even if we're not able to provide messages in the native
> > language of the user, it's still _very_ useful for the user to be able
> > to type mails in his own language.
>
> This is not how the reasoning was made all al
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> > However, I still think we should be selective in it. For instance, I
> > don't see any purpose in having a keymap for Oriya/India while we
> > don't support Oriya in D-I.
>
> Why not? Even if we're not able to provide messages in the native
> l
Christian Perrier, le Sat 04 Jul 2009 22:19:19 +0200, a écrit :
> > Ok, that's no regression from what we had previously and we have no
> > AD locale for now, but should we really select keyboards by hand and
>
> There *is* a ca_AD locale...
Oh, right, I was looking for a cat_AD locale.
> Howeve
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> That approach misses things. For instance, Andorra (AD)'s official
> language is catalan (cat), for which you only provide es' cat variant
> layout. Xorg does have an ad layout which is quite different from es'
> cat variant. And that is only the
Christian Perrier, le Sat 04 Jul 2009 11:31:07 +0200, a écrit :
> I went through all languages.
That approach misses things. For instance, Andorra (AD)'s official
language is catalan (cat), for which you only provide es' cat variant
layout. Xorg does have an ad layout which is quite different from
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> The general idea would be *selecting* a number of model|layout|variant
> that are well suited with respect to the languages we support in D-I.
> This, for each architecture...
>
> In short, mimic what we're currently doing in console-data.
>
> Ea
Christian Perrier, le Mon 29 Jun 2009 06:58:21 +0200, a écrit :
> My point was *not* about showing a different list to users depending
> on the language they selected.
>
> It was just about building *one* list that would offer users all
> "reasonable" choices.
Ah. I'm still afraid that's not very
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org):
> I'd even say, one language/country, one layout. Note for instance
> french, for which there are a lot of layouts, from BE, CA, CH, FR,
> ... But there is little chance getting wrong when taking the country
> into account too. That's why I proposed
Hello,
Christian Perrier, le Sun 28 Jun 2009 19:43:01 +0200, a écrit :
> The general rule would then be: one language, one layoutwith
> exceptions when established practice needs them.
I'd even say, one language/country, one layout. Note for instance
french, for which there are a lot of layou
In followup to Frans' review, please find here my current thoughts
about possible ways to greatly simplify things when configuring
console-setup *in D-I* as well as greatly reduce the size impact.
The general idea would be *selecting* a number of model|layout|variant
that are well suited with res
10 matches
Mail list logo
