Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-25 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 26 March 2009, Kenshi Muto wrote: > Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > > Your patch looks great but to solve the conflict, please add a > > > led-modules (any better suggestion?), and make both depends on it. > > > To make it buildable. > > > > H

Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-25 Thread Kenshi Muto
Hi, At 25 Mar 09 19:01:07 GMT, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Your patch looks great but to solve the conflict, please add a > > led-modules (any better suggestion?), and make both depends on it. To > > make it buildable. > > How big is it? What are the

Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-25 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 25 March 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Your patch looks great but to solve the conflict, please add a > led-modules (any better suggestion?), and make both depends on it. To > make it buildable. How big is it? What are the dependencies? If it is small enough (which seems likely, why

Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-25 Thread Otavio Salvador
Kenshi Muto writes: [...] > I noticed ath[59]k drivers conflicted with sdhci in mmc-modules to want > to use led-class. [...] Your patch looks great but to solve the conflict, please add a led-modules (any better suggestion?), and make both depends on it. To make it buildable. Doing it, we c

Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-25 Thread Kenshi Muto
Hi, At 23 Mar 09 14:53:21 GMT, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Kenshi Muto wrote: > >> * Otavio Salvador [2009-03-21 17:02]: > >> > This is the first proposal of patches to update our kernel to > >> > 2.6.29. I belive we'll still have changes to do on this set of patch

Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-23 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Kenshi Muto wrote: > Hi, > > At 22 Mar 09 18:23:53 GMT, > Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> * Otavio Salvador [2009-03-21 17:02]: >> > This is the first proposal of patches to update our kernel to >> > 2.6.29. I belive we'll still have changes to do on this set of patch

Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-23 Thread Kenshi Muto
Hi, At 22 Mar 09 18:23:53 GMT, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Otavio Salvador [2009-03-21 17:02]: > > This is the first proposal of patches to update our kernel to > > 2.6.29. I belive we'll still have changes to do on this set of patches > > before really commiting it but it would be nice if porter

Re: updating kernel-wedge

2009-03-22 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Otavio Salvador [2009-03-21 17:02]: > This is the first proposal of patches to update our kernel to > 2.6.29. I belive we'll still have changes to do on this set of patches > before really commiting it but it would be nice if porters could take > a look at them and propose patches for any remain