Re: proposals for netcfg-static

2002-11-22 Thread Thorsten Sauter
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 01:25:42AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Take it as a learning experience. :) Also, the place to be when you > wonder about how something is done in d-i and before starting to hack > on something is #debian-boot on freenode (irc.debian.org), so we don't > do double work.

Re: proposals for netcfg-static

2002-11-21 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Thorsten Sauter | On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:48:54AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > Netcfg is supposed to be rewritten once we get a more up-to-date | > busybox in the archive (with the «ip» command compiled in). | | shit, so I have done the wrong job. Take it as a learning experience. :)

Re: proposals for netcfg-static

2002-11-21 Thread Thorsten Sauter
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 12:48:54AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > Netcfg is supposed to be rewritten once we get a more up-to-date > busybox in the archive (with the «ip» command compiled in). shit, so I have done the wrong job. > client->command(client, "get", "netcfg/get_gateway", NULL); > >

Re: proposals for netcfg-static

2002-11-20 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
* Thorsten Sauter | after playing with the new installer, I have found some mysterious in | the netcfg-static binary. | | If you configure the network the first time the netcfg-static propose | and calculate some default values for the network (ip-adress, subnet, | gateway, ...). However this sh