On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:08:02AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> We are aware of that and did some tests with it. I tried to build the
> state of the repository as it was on the day the public access was
> announced, but it failed. After a quick glance over the build system I
> noticed, that it
Am Mon, den 08.12.2003 schrieb David Nusinow um 00:12:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:00:06AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > David Nusinow was interested in it. If he still wants to take it I'm
> > fine with that. I'm not particularly interested in maintaining a package
> > that will be obsoleted
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > IMO if we want to release sarge with discover2 for d-i we have to
> > release beta2 with discover2 (after that it's too late for this
> > change!)
>
> I agree with Joey, we should try to have everything ready just after
> beta2 is released.
One caveat: If someone is
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:00:06AM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> David Nusinow was interested in it. If he still wants to take it I'm
> fine with that. I'm not particularly interested in maintaining a package
> that will be obsoleted soon, but if nobody is interested in it I will
> take it.
I'
Am Son, den 07.12.2003 schrieb Doug Porter um 19:00:
> Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One consequence of this is that we need discover2 udebs ASAP.
>
> If you guys haven't noticed, there are bits in the Subversion
> repository for building a udeb. I've successfully built a u
Am Son, den 07.12.2003 schrieb Petter Reinholdtsen um 19:45:
> [Gaudenz Steinlin] wrote:
> > There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
> > which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive
> > due to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition
[Gaudenz Steinlin] wrote:
> There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
> which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive
> due to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition:
Hm, wish I had found this email earlier today. Then I would have
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One consequence of this is that we need discover2 udebs ASAP.
If you guys haven't noticed, there are bits in the Subversion
repository for building a udeb. I've successfully built a udeb
with it just now, but I have no idea if the resultant udeb is
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Well, here's what I'd personally like: :)
>
> 1) Get a good feedback cycle going between Progeny and debian-boot
>regarding discover2's suitability for debian-installer. The goal
>here is "feature-complete", not "bug-free".
> 2) Hand off maintenance off Discover
There apparently was some discussion between branden robinson and me
which did not get through to the list or at least the list archive due
to the break in. Branden proposed the following transition:
---
Well, here's what I'd personally like: :)
1) Get a good feedback cycle going between Proge
10 matches
Mail list logo
