Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-11 Thread Richard Hirst
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 08:39:26PM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Should I commit the changes I needed to active UTF on m68k? Will it still > work on VME? I don't know if there are similar problems on other arches, Tested on mvme166; as the vme boards only have serial console, the install

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-10 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 02:39, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Should I commit the changes I needed to active UTF on m68k? Will it still > work on VME? I don't know if there are similar problems on other arches, > other video hardware, I only got one success report from a Mac quadra user. > Is this e

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-09 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 18:04, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Planar grafics? This is using a grafic card, I could try without, using > native video if you think that helps. It's worth a try. We might at least learn something. What driver does your card use? I guess the native one is amifb.c, ri

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-09 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 01:27, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > So, the framebuffer on my amiga is special? I was told it works on a mac... "Special" is one word for it. :-) What does fbset say if you run it on the Amiga? It sounds like your framebuffer is reporting its geometry or something in a w

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-08 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 06:17:46PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 16:50, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:42:31PM +, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > Can you try running bterm on its own and see if it works at all for you? > > > > Does that work on

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-08 Thread Philip Blundell
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 16:50, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 04:42:31PM +, Phil Blundell wrote: > > Can you try running bterm on its own and see if it works at all for you? > > Does that work on a console? > > cts@lepjas2:~>bterm > Usage: bterm -f font.bgf [ -l locale

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-08 Thread Phil Blundell
On Fri, 2002-03-08 at 15:00, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > The boot-floppies on amiga usually boot in 640x480, but I just tried > 1024x768, some thing. Maybe is related to the Penguin in the top left corner > which is not deleted? The non-UTF boot-floppies always cleared the screen so > that the

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-07 Thread Junichi Uekawa
"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > My X is not working yet, but I got positive feedback from a Mac Quadra 840AV > user. Everything (well, he did not complete the installation and tested only > english, but: "I saw the different languages pop up. Maybe I'll try th

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-07 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 15:21, Guido Guenther wrote: > IP22 is currently the only supported subarch on big endian mips machines, > since none of the mips porters has access to something else. I see. In that case, you're right, there is no point in turning on i18n for mips at the moment. p. --

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-07 Thread Guido Guenther
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 03:19:50PM +, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 14:54, Guido Guenther wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:21:14PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > > [..snip..] > > > The only requirements I can think of are: > > > > > > - framebuffer support in your kerne

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-07 Thread Phil Blundell
On Thu, 2002-03-07 at 14:54, Guido Guenther wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:21:14PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > [..snip..] > > The only requirements I can think of are: > > > > - framebuffer support in your kernel (should be no problem for m68k) > There's no fb support on mips ip22 and

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-07 Thread Guido Guenther
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:21:14PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: [..snip..] > The only requirements I can think of are: > > - framebuffer support in your kernel (should be no problem for m68k) There's no fb support on mips ip22 and and it most likely won't be implemented in the near future. Thi

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-06 Thread Phil Blundell
On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 04:58, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I tried it on my amiga, it does not seem to work. All the output (blue > background with window, text et all) seems to be scrolled through the first > line of the display, all the other lines remain empty. Until I switch to the > second c

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-04 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 22:58, Richard Hirst wrote: > 1. Ugly borders to dialog boxes, using +-| rather than graphics chars. > (this on vga, not on serial). This is a real shame, the installer was > looking pretty smart in my non-i18n build. I'm assuming other i18n > enabled archs have this same p

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-04 Thread Richard Hirst
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:48:00PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > I see that sparc, mips, hppa and m68k have not yet enabled the > LANGUAGE_CHOOSER. Is there any particular reason for that? It would be > good to have i18n on as many architectures as possible by the time we > release. I just tu

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-04 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 21:37, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:53:13PM -0800, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > I'll try to build without cfdisk-utf8 for m68k... > > that seems to work, but: > > E: rootatari.bin is larger than root1440atari.bin (1495947 > 1474560) > E:

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-04 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-03-04 at 01:34, Richard Hirst wrote: > So, for vme, there will be no frame buffer support in the kernel. Does > having lang chooser turned on then present a problem, or will it just > drop back to something sensible? It'll fall back to an English installation. Serial console is sup

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-03 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:43:23AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 01:34:00 + > Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For ia64 and hppa, there will be frame buffer support in the kernel, but > > (for hppa, anyway) it might not support the particular h/w. Also the >

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 01:34:00 + Richard Hirst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For ia64 and hppa, there will be frame buffer support in the kernel, but > (for hppa, anyway) it might not support the particular h/w. Also the > install might be done via serial console. Will lang chooser drop back >

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-03 Thread Richard Hirst
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:21:14PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > The only requirements I can think of are: > > - framebuffer support in your kernel (should be no problem for m68k) Quite a problem for the various m68k vme boards, which are all serial console only (mvme16x, bvme6000, mvme147 su

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-03 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 21:49, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > > I see that sparc, mips, hppa and m68k have not yet enabled the > > LANGUAGE_CHOOSER. Is there any particular reason for that? It would be > > good to have i18n on as many archit

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-03 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > I see that sparc, mips, hppa and m68k have not yet enabled the > LANGUAGE_CHOOSER. Is there any particular reason for that? It would be > good to have i18n on as many architectures as possible by the time we > release. It would be ni

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-03 Thread Philip Blundell
On Sun, 2002-03-03 at 20:51, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:48:00PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > > I see that sparc, mips, hppa and m68k have not yet enabled the > > LANGUAGE_CHOOSER. Is there any particular reason for that? It would be > > good to have i18n on as m

Re: non-i18n'd arches

2002-03-03 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 07:48:00PM +, Philip Blundell wrote: > I see that sparc, mips, hppa and m68k have not yet enabled the > LANGUAGE_CHOOSER. Is there any particular reason for that? It would be > good to have i18n on as many architectures as possible by the time we > release. Speaking