Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 10:36:49PM +0100, Erik C.J. Laan wrote: > asking one more question before the actual reboot happened. Soo: I can't > tell how much time it took, but certainly over 12 hours. That's slow, but it sounds like we actually support 24MB already and there's still some quite a bi

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Erik C.J. Laan
Stephen R Marenka wrote: On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 11:40:57PM +0100, Erik C.J. Laan wrote: I'm still doing that... not waiting for you, but for the machine. I started the "Installing the Debian base system" step around 15:00 local time, and now it is 23:30 and it's at 87% (for the complete last hou

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:35:22AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:46:04PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Debian-installer has gotten to the point on m68k that it's ready for a > > few more people than me to try to break it. Ideally, we'd like d-i to > > work b

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:40:56AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:38:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > > IIRC kernel was the only subdirectory in /lib/modules/2.4.24 and that was > > > empty. I will have a look again though. > > > > Are you sure it is name

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Joey Hess
Christian T. Steigies wrote: > Yes, because I introduced the subarch name only in 2.4.25. Maybe I should > get a new ramdisk image though... > > > 13:25 < joeyh> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian-installer/kernel/m68k>find |grep > > -i zorro > > 13:25 < joeyh> ./lib/modules/2.4.25-amiga/kernel/drive

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:38:06PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > IIRC kernel was the only subdirectory in /lib/modules/2.4.24 and that was > > empty. I will have a look again though. > > Are you sure it is named 2.4.24, and not 2.4.24-amiga or something such ? Yes, because I introduced the

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 06:26:09AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:23:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:35:22AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:46:04PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > Debian-in

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 01:23:29PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:35:22AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:46:04PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > Debian-installer has gotten to the point on m68k that it's ready for a > > > few more pe

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 04:35:22AM -0600, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:46:04PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > Debian-installer has gotten to the point on m68k that it's ready for a > > few more people than me to try to break it. Ideally, we'd like d-i to > > work b

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-17 Thread Christian T. Steigies
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 01:46:04PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > Debian-installer has gotten to the point on m68k that it's ready for a > few more people than me to try to break it. Ideally, we'd like d-i to > work before beta 3 gets released in a few weeks. I tried this last night on my Amiga

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-05 Thread david howe
Little success here to report. I have not managed to get a 2ci to boot on the images at all (penguin gets to ABCEFGHIJ) and my quadra950 reports that their are several instances of EXT2-fs error Wrong free inode count in group 0 (and group1 and superblock) leading to a kernel panic - fails to

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-04 Thread Herbert Kaminski
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:15:34 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:05:34PM +0100, Herbert Kaminski wrote: >> ...so trying to test the installer on an MVME162 with only 16MB got >> no chance to succeed? > >Not currently, no. If you have space to expand your available RAM, >there'

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-03 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:15:34PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:05:34PM +0100, Herbert Kaminski wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:46:04 -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > > > >I'm working on supporting atari and the vmes, but it'd be nice to know > > >that someone out

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-03 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 11:05:34PM +0100, Herbert Kaminski wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:46:04 -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > > >I'm working on supporting atari and the vmes, but it'd be nice to know > >that someone out there cares enough to test > > Well, yes I do care, but... > > >Addition

Re: m68k debian-installer call for testers

2004-03-03 Thread Herbert Kaminski
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:46:04 -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: >I'm working on supporting atari and the vmes, but it'd be nice to know >that someone out there cares enough to test Well, yes I do care, but... >Additionally, the mac ram disks require you to use >ramdisk_size=2 as a kernel paramet