This one time, at band camp, Otavio Salvador said:
> Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> >
> >> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dro
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:53:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
>> i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit NEW.
>
> Nack.
Do you mind to be more descriptive?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
>>
>> I'd say a NEWS entry.
>>
> If the package doesn't
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:53:22PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
> i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit NEW.
Nack.
Bastian
--
You're dead, Jim.
-- McCoy, "The Tholian Web", stardate unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 10:12:32 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
>
> I'd say a NEWS entry.
>
If the package doesn't exist anymore, it can't have a NEWS file. And
spamming
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> shall we give a README.Debian note on the vserser-xen flavour dropping?
I'd say a NEWS entry.
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
-
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116
GNU/Linux User: 239
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, maximilian attems wrote:
> the current release blocker is the linux-libc-dev patch by
> waldi that is reviewed by vorlon to keep the lenny build chain stable.
patch incorporating review got in.
thanks waldi and vorlon!
i'll announce upload of 2.6.26-1 for tomorrow, will hit
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 08:07:25PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > That's just adding an arbitrary 5 days delay. Uploading to experimental
> > won't uncover new issues, because nobody uses packages in experimental.
> Uploading it to sid, will make a revertion to .25 much harder if
> needed. Be
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:02:26 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>> I'd prefer to have it on experimental before upload it to unstable so
>> first and more urgent issues wouldn't bother us and users however this
>> is more up to you and RM team then me.
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 09:02:26 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> I'd prefer to have it on experimental before upload it to unstable so
> first and more urgent issues wouldn't bother us and users however this
> is more up to you and RM team then me. My preference would be:
>
> - upload to experim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup
> plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26
> before final ack on that release.
If this is the d
maximilian attems a écrit :
> latest 2.6.25 stable release is in testing, we expect to keep it as backup
> plan for lenny. release team wishes to have unstable coverage of 2.6.26
> before final ack on that release.
>
> the current release blocker is the linux-libc-dev patch by
> waldi that is rev
12 matches
Mail list logo
