Re: glibc udebs built with -Os

2006-05-30 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Sven Luther a écrit : On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:47:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: Well that could be done, but that does not really change the problem, I mean a glibc with -Os has still to be built, which seems to cause some problems as describe in my previous mail. Does it cause proble

Re: glibc udebs

2006-05-30 Thread sferriol
Joey Hess a écrit : Aurelien Jarno wrote: I manage to build smaller udebs for the glibc. I built it with -Os, and disabled support for 2.4 kernels. On i386, the gain is 124kB on the udebs size and 260kB on the installed size. Currently it is built in a dirty way by doing that on the main lib

Re: glibc udebs built with -Os

2006-05-30 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 01:47:15PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Well that could be done, but that does not really change the problem, I > mean a glibc with -Os has still to be built, which seems to cause some > problems as describe in my previous mail. Does it cause problems everywhere, or jus

Re: glibc udebs built with -Os

2006-05-30 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi all, After a discussion with Joey Hess and later with Frans Pop at Debconf 6, we have decided that it could be a good idea to have a udeb glibc built with -Os. I have made a few tests, mainly on i386 and amd64, and

Re: glibc udebs built with -Os

2006-05-30 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi all, > > After a discussion with Joey Hess and later with Frans Pop at Debconf > 6, we have decided that it could be a good idea to have a udeb glibc > built with -Os. > > I have made a few tests, mainly on i386 and amd64, and also on all > architect

Re: glibc udebs

2006-05-28 Thread Joey Hess
Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Well if it is only for d-i, maybe it should be a udeb package? The only > concern I have with that is that it has to go through NEW... A udeb isn't really appropriate for a -pic package, since it would be used at image build time, not run time, and the pic library would no

Re: glibc udebs

2006-05-28 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Joey Hess wrote: Aurelien Jarno wrote: I manage to build smaller udebs for the glibc. I built it with -Os, and disabled support for 2.4 kernels. On i386, the gain is 124kB on the udebs size and 260kB on the installed size. Currently it is built in a dirty way by doing that on the main library

Re: glibc udebs

2006-05-25 Thread Joey Hess
Aurelien Jarno wrote: > I manage to build smaller udebs for the glibc. I built it with -Os, and > disabled support for 2.4 kernels. On i386, the gain is 124kB on the > udebs size and 260kB on the installed size. > > Currently it is built in a dirty way by doing that on the main library. > If it