Re: dpkg should support a --force-unsafe-io option or such

2010-10-10 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On sekmadienis 10 Spalis 2010 01:06:41 Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote: > ... > > > It does not make much sense for dpkg to be in this uber-paranoid mode at > > debian-installer time. If power fails, install process will probably have > > to

Re: dpkg should support a --force-unsafe-io option or such

2010-10-09 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Modestas Vainius wrote: ... > It does not make much sense for dpkg to be in this uber-paranoid mode at > debian-installer time. If power fails, install process will probably have to > be started from scratch anyway. What's more, obviously I have no choice to

Re: dpkg should support a --force-unsafe-io option or such

2010-10-08 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On trečiadienis 02 Birželis 2010 20:14:38 LaMont Jones wrote: > With the introduction of fsync() calls to protect data, applications > that do potentially large apt-get install invocations may not want > to incur the penalty of fsync() calls from dpkg. > > In the case of building a livecd,