Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps

Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > So on m68k, I should not need zlib-bin, linuxdoc-tools, or snarf. > > Bug filed, you can use this patch in the meantime Er, actually, us this one instead. --- /usr/bin/dpkg-checkbuilddepsWed Jun 6 23:39:21 2001 +++ dpkg-checkbuilddeps

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps

Christian T. Steigies wrote: > So on m68k, I should not need zlib-bin, linuxdoc-tools, or snarf. Bug filed, you can use this patch in the meantime --- /usr/bin/dpkg-checkbuilddepsWed Jun 6 23:39:21 2001 +++ dpkg-checkbuilddeps Mon Jun 11 10:54:37 2001 @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps

Adam Di Carlo wrote: > "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Who's fooling who? Or is this a special feature of the boot-floppies? > > I think dpkg 1.9.8 for m68k was not built/uploaded because the i386 version > > made some trouble. > > I guess you'll have to work around the

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps

"Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Who's fooling who? Or is this a special feature of the boot-floppies? > I think dpkg 1.9.8 for m68k was not built/uploaded because the i386 version > made some trouble. I guess you'll have to work around the lack of a new dpkg by either (a) r

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 12:21:23AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > I'm having a little trouble with the boot-floppies dpkg-checkbuilddeps: > > dpkg-buildpackage: build architecture is m68k > > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: zlib-bin, dosfstools, >linuxdo

Re: dpkg-checkbuilddeps

Christian T. Steigies wrote: > I'm having a little trouble with the boot-floppies dpkg-checkbuilddeps: > dpkg-buildpackage: build architecture is m68k > dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: zlib-bin, dosfstools, linuxdoc-tools, >snarf > dpkg-buildpackage: Build dependencies/conflicts un