Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-19 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 07:49:20AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 19 May 2006 06:10, Sven Luther wrote: > > Also, there is another thing to consider, i will need to do some > > nobootlaoder changes in the near future, before we can release the new > > version of the pegasos firmware, so that d

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 19 May 2006 06:10, Sven Luther wrote: > Also, there is another thing to consider, i will need to do some > nobootlaoder changes in the near future, before we can release the new > version of the pegasos firmware, so that debian will not break on it > (and since we ship those boxes with de

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-18 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:02:20AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 18 May 2006 23:28, Steve Langasek wrote: > > If you are the maintainer of nobootloader, and you are not allowed to > > commit to the d-i svn repo, then it is appropriate to request that the > > d-i maintainers deprecate the sv

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-18 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:28:27PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I > > either > > upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of > >

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 18 May 2006 23:28, Steve Langasek wrote: > If you are the maintainer of nobootloader, and you are not allowed to > commit to the d-i svn repo, then it is appropriate to request that the > d-i maintainers deprecate the svn repo for these packages. Well, as far as Joey and I are concerne

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-18 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I either > upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of the > d-i svn like above. > Now, someone else needs to modify nobootloader. He

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-18 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 05:42:16PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I > > either > > upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-18 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:20:12PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Imagine i upload a new nobootloader version, with some changes in it. I either > upload it directly, without revision system, or with my own shadow copy of the > d-i svn like above. > > Now, someone else needs to modify nobootloader

Re: distributed version control systems

2006-05-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 04:57:44PM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 07:53:48AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:18:28AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > > Both SVN and CVS have a server-centric model that ultimately leads > > > to na