Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-19 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 08:42 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Thursday 19 November 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > I'll test it. If that work, would it be ok to modify the default netboot > > images ? I have tested multiple initrd with pxelinux, using initrd=initrd.gz,extra.cpio.gz and that works. Act

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-18 Thread Frans Pop
On Thursday 19 November 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > I'll test it. If that work, would it be ok to modify the default netboot > images ? Not sure that I understand you correctly, but I don't think it would be a good idea to list a "morestuff.cpio.gz" in standard images if we don't ship it in th

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-18 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 18:59 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > > Allow preseeding using TFTP (reqested by Otavio) > > --- > > 3. Or is it possible to pass multiple "initrd=" to a given Kernel? I have investigated this situation

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-18 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 20:08 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > Wouldn't it be simpler to just allow a user to specify the image on the > > command line using a new command? Something like: > >di-netboot-assistant custom --name="mybuild" > > > > The name

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-17 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 17 November 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > Wouldn't it be simpler to just allow a user to specify the image on the > command line using a new command? Something like: >di-netboot-assistant custom --name="mybuild" > > The name option could be optional with a default of "custom". > The arch

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-17 Thread Frans Pop
Hmmm. Just installed a new image using the new version and got: r...@elrond:/etc/dhcp3# di-netboot-assistant install --arch=amd64 daily I: Processing daily/amd64. I: Upgrading PXELinux (3.71 to 3.83) W: Some menu binaries are missing. Install the package syslinux W: Some menu binaries are missing.

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-17 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 27 October 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > I have two feature request that are pending, and I need your help: > > Using local repository (requested by fjp) This is more important now as my previous method to include custom images no longer works without the DHCP patchprefix. > I wondere

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-11-17 Thread Frans Pop
Sorry for the delayed reply. Too busy working on other things and I forgot. On Sunday 25 October 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > There is also an upgrade problem. It looks like when I upgrade that > > the default configs do get changed, but not the actual existing > > configs in /var/lib/di-netboo

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-10-27 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 06:20 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >> On Friday 16 October 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: >> > I have finally resolved and merged a bunch of patch I had for >> > di-netboot-assistant. >> > [..] I have worked on some patch to clean-up the code, and fix buggy pa

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-10-25 Thread Frank Lin PIAT
On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 06:20 +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Friday 16 October 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > > I have finally resolved and merged a bunch of patch I had for > > di-netboot-assistant. > > [..] > > I don't think experimental is the right choice here. I doubt you would get > anybody to a

Re: di-netboot-assistant update for experimental

2009-10-24 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 16 October 2009, Frank Lin PIAT wrote: > I have finally resolved and merged a bunch of patch I had for > di-netboot-assistant. Please mark the changelog as "UNRELEASED" when you start on a new version to make it clear to others using the SVN repo that there are changes that have not be