On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 11:40:31AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > (b) Isn't the slang/stool frontend much better than the dialog one? How
> > come we don't want it as default?
>
> It's incomplete. See the set of bugs filed against it.
>
> Also, in a poll, a lot more users
Anthony Towns wrote:
> (b) Isn't the slang/stool frontend much better than the dialog one? How
> come we don't want it as default?
It's incomplete. See the set of bugs filed against it.
Also, in a poll, a lot more users said they used the dialog frontend
than anything else.
--
see shy jo
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 07:46:32PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Second, do we want to include libterm-stool-perl and libterm-slang-perl
> > so the debconf slang frontend works?
> No, the dialog frontend will be the default. That change may not have
> propigated to testing yet.
(a) I thought I'd al
Richard Hirst wrote:
> First, does anyone really need both libncurses4 and libncurses5?
Check and see if anything in base uses the old lib..
> Second, do we want to include libterm-stool-perl and libterm-slang-perl
> so the debconf slang frontend works?
No, the dialog frontend will be the defau
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 06:19:11PM +0100, Richard Hirst wrote:
> First, does anyone really need both libncurses4 and libncurses5?
As far as I can tell, only six packages in sid depend on
libncurses4, none of which appear to be important (no offense).
Is there anyone with a woody system who can se
5 matches
Mail list logo
