Also, cdebconf-priority is only in the cdrom initrd, any other means of
boot will not ask the question until after the system has gotten far
enough to install that udeb, which can be quite far along.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The point of putting it there was that many users weren't aware
> they _could_ change the priority, and ask more questions
> (eg the kbd-chooser default issue). It pretty much needs to be asked to be noticed;
> people just fail to read the boot splash screen.
But there
Quoting Alastair McKinstry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> that until after the string freeze, though, and for people with better English
> than me (eg Christian Perrier :-))
You're kidding me, Alastair...:-). *you* are the one who lives in a
country where most people use english daily (with an horrible a
Am Do, den 18.12.2003 schrieb Alastair McKinstry um 12:45:
> >Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >> Having this ugly debconf priority question right after choosing the
> >> language is annoying. Do we really need it there?
> >
> >I haven't tested a full d-i for a while now, but I think I can
>Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Having this ugly debconf priority question right after choosing the
>> language is annoying. Do we really need it there?
>
>I haven't tested a full d-i for a while now, but I think I can get the
>point.
The point of putting it there was that many users we
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Having this ugly debconf priority question right after choosing the
> language is annoying. Do we really need it there?
I haven't tested a full d-i for a while now, but I think I can get the
point.
debconf priority question needs to be asked, imho. Having
6 matches
Mail list logo
