> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 03:01:57PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> >
> > can you find out what version of busybox these boot-floppies were
> > built with? this problem went away for me as soon as i started
> > building with busybox 0.51-9.
> busybox_1%3a0.51-10_m68k.deb I suspect, because that
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 03:01:57PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> can you find out what version of busybox these boot-floppies were
> built with? this problem went away for me as soon as i started
> building with busybox 0.51-9.
busybox_1%3a0.51-10_m68k.deb I suspect, because thats in
archive
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 09:46:27PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> Seems I've been somewhat more lucky on Atari.
>
> Minor gripe: could we get the installer to add a leading / to the
> archive path when the dumb user forgot to put it there? Sure happened to
> me, you guessed it.
would that so
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 03:02:04PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
>
> > I am uploading the latest m68k boot-floppies build to:
> > http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/
> what a pitty that I have to follow up myself... trying to install this at
> home, I get the following messages:
>
> insta
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> Hi,
> I am uploading the latest m68k boot-floppies build to:
> http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/
> I had to complete the build by hand (my own fault, I improved[1] the
> boot-floppies) and I do not want to waste the CPU cycles.
> It will still ta
On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 03:02:04PM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> I am uploading the latest m68k boot-floppies build to:
> http://auric.debian.org/~cts/bf/
what a pitty that I have to follow up myself... trying to install this at
home, I get the following messages:
installing kernel and
6 matches
Mail list logo
