Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-16 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 12 June 2006 23:25, Joey Hess wrote: > hppa: update udebs and build/config from 2.6.16-1 to 2.6.16-2 I've pinged Kyle to update these, but -14 is not available for hppa yet (FTBS). Should be fixed when -15 is uploaded. Kyle will update udebs after that. > sparc: update udebs and build

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Stephen R Marenka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-13 14:55]: > > add 2.6 kernels to CDs for appropriate subarches > see attached Please send this to the debian-cd list. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Stephen R Marenka
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > m68k: update udebs from 2.6.16-1 to 2.6.16-2 already in archive (0.74) > add 2.6 kernels to CDs for appropriate subarches see attached -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-06-12 17:25]: > arm: update udebs and build/config from 2.6.16-1 to 2.6.16-2 udebs are in NEW now. > mips: update udebs and build/config from 2.6.16-1 to 2.6.16-2 udebs are in NEW now. > mipsel: ditto mips 2.6.16-2 currently doesn't build on mipsel for unk

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 01:20:00PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:32:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >> > Alternatively i may provide a patch, not sure against which pa

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Otavio Salvador
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:32:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > Alternatively i may provide a patch, not sure against which package to >> > report >> > it though. >> >> If you provide a patch I can rev

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:32:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Alternatively i may provide a patch, not sure against which package to > > report > > it though. > > If you provide a patch I can review and apply it in d-i svn > repository. Yeah, b

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Otavio Salvador
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alternatively i may provide a patch, not sure against which package to report > it though. If you provide a patch I can review and apply it in d-i svn repository. -- O T A V I OS A L V A D O R - E

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Based on my recent update to the kerntabl, the following seems to need > to be done on a per-arch basis: > alpha: update udebs and build/config to 2.6.16-2 kernel (from .15) Uploaded to NEW. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-12 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Alternatively i may provide a patch, not sure against which package to report > it though. debian-installer would seem right, imho. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-12 Thread Joey Hess
Bastian Blank wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > s390: drop 2.4 udebs > > Yep. I don't see a removal request on file. > > drop 2.4 kernel support from base-installer (?) > > Already done. Ok if I remove the s390 line for 2.4 from templates-arch then?

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-12 Thread Sven Luther
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > popwerpc: update udebs and build/config from 2.6.16-1 to 2.6.16-2 I would do that if my commit right would be restablished. Alternatively i may provide a patch, not sure against which package to report it though. /me wish the d-i peopl

Re: arch kernel status

2006-06-12 Thread Bastian Blank
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 05:25:29PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > s390: drop 2.4 udebs Yep. > drop 2.4 kernel support from base-installer (?) Already done. Bastian -- Women are more easily and more deeply terrified ... generating more sheer horror than the male of the species.