Re: Third option

2006-06-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 10:41:32AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:52:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > [ in my words: energy drain ]

Re: Third option

2006-06-16 Thread Geert Stappers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:52:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > [ in my words: energy drain ] > > > > > So, there is

Re: Third option

2006-06-16 Thread Sven Luther
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:26:04AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote: > Disclaimer: > > This E-mail does NOT contain an explaination of common sense. > Neither an advice for a reallity check. > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > [ in my words: energy drain ] > > > So

Re: Third option

2006-06-16 Thread Geert Stappers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Disclaimer: This E-mail does NOT contain an explaination of common sense. Neither an advice for a reallity check. On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 08:39:19AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: [ in my words: energy drain ] > So, there is only two ways this can e