On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> This would certainly make fixing stuff easier for me. Then I could do
> that myself. What are the rules to add someone to this group?
Added now :-D
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://
Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Son Nov 07 07:29:17 +0100 2010:
> Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
>
> > > OK, I finally got around to add some mail support to the daily
> > > aggregator script. It only sends a mail if there are old or failed
> > > builds. See the attach
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
> > OK, I finally got around to add some mail support to the daily
> > aggregator script. It only sends a mail if there are old or failed
> > builds. See the attached patch.
>
> Ping, any comments on this? If the patch looks OK I can commit it to
> t
Hi
Excerpts from Gaudenz Steinlin's message of Son Okt 31 16:49:39 +0100 2010:
> Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Die Sep 14 06:55:28 +0200 2010:
> > Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> > > Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > What I would also like to have is a way to easily *monitor* the
Hi Andi
Many thanks, that was exactly the information I was looking for.
Excerpts from Andreas Barth's message of Mit Nov 03 07:52:32 +0100 2010:
> * Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org) [101103 01:37]:
> > This is indeed suboptimal. :-( Would it be possible to give some
> > (ideally more than o
* Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org) [101103 01:37]:
> This is indeed suboptimal. :-( Would it be possible to give some
> (ideally more than one person to not create bottlenecks) persons from
> the d-i team access to the buildds where d-i daily builds are built so
> they can investigate these is
[ Context for debian-wb-team: This thread started because not all
autobuilder setups for d-i are currently working properly and I tried
to figure out why but got stuck because I could not figure out how
these build are triggered. ]
Hi
Excerpts from Luk Claes's message of Son Okt 31 18:53:37 +010
On 10/31/2010 04:49 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Die Sep 14 06:55:28 +0200 2010:
>> Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
>>> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> - There are still some old builds. I'm still looking for someone to
> document the current autobu
Excerpts from Christian PERRIER's message of Die Sep 14 06:55:28 +0200 2010:
> Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> > Christian PERRIER wrote:
> What I would also like to have is a way to easily *monitor* these
> daily builds. I'd be fine to do it myself on a regular basis if
> there's a way to
On 09/22/2010 06:39 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
>
>> IMHO the most prominent gap is that there is no indication if a buildd
>> fails to upload a log to d-i.debian.org at all. Like it is the case for
>> several architectures since Aug 17th.
>>
>> I
Quoting Gaudenz Steinlin (gaud...@debian.org):
> IMHO the most prominent gap is that there is no indication if a buildd
> fails to upload a log to d-i.debian.org at all. Like it is the case for
> several architectures since Aug 17th.
>
> I could not find any information about how the process of
Hi Otavio and others
Sorry, but I fear I need a little bit more handholding on this. There
are too many things I faild to figure out on myself...
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 20:02 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > Excerpts from Joe
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Excerpts from Joey Hess's message of Mit Sep 15 21:26:06 +0200 2010:
>> Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> > I would volunteer to create some monitoring scripts and status pages
>> > for the daily builds if someone provides me with the inf
Excerpts from Joey Hess's message of Mit Sep 15 21:26:06 +0200 2010:
> Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > I would volunteer to create some monitoring scripts and status pages
> > for the daily builds if someone provides me with the information about
> > how the daily builds on the autobuilders are current
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I would volunteer to create some monitoring scripts and status pages
> for the daily builds if someone provides me with the information about
> how the daily builds on the autobuilders are currently done and where
> I can find the relevant scripts.
Are you familiar with
Excerpts from Cyril Brulebois's message of Die Sep 14 11:51:02 +0200 2010:
> Christian PERRIER (14/09/2010):
> > What I would also like to have is a way to easily *monitor* these
> > daily builds.
>
> I had that in mind at some point, but I'm currently busy with some
> upstream work. Feel free to
Christian PERRIER (14/09/2010):
> What I would also like to have is a way to easily *monitor* these
> daily builds.
I had that in mind at some point, but I'm currently busy with some
upstream work. Feel free to poke me in some days if you didn't find a
volunteer at that point.
Mraw,
KiBi.
sign
Quoting Joey Hess (jo...@debian.org):
> Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > On the other hand, I think that other daily builds done in Joey Hess'
> > home are very safe. Obviously, Joey has proven over years how reliable
> > he can be and I don't see urgency to change this.
>
> Aside from not being in th
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> On the other hand, I think that other daily builds done in Joey Hess'
> home are very safe. Obviously, Joey has proven over years how reliable
> he can be and I don't see urgency to change this.
Aside from not being in the building where that box is all the time, and
it
Op 20100913 om 22:16 schreef Christian PERRIER:
> As I just mentioned on IRC, a few daily builds seem currently non
> optimal:
>
> - s390 builds still point to Frans' home on people.d.o. It's very sad
> to say this, of course, but that doesn't exist anymore..:-(
>
> - sparc builds point to Geert
20 matches
Mail list logo
