Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:54:00PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't > > > seem to be any new d-i cha

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 09:01 +0900, dann frazier wrote: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Thanks for the upload; the builds seem to be going well. There don't > > seem to be any new d-i changes in git, so I assume we "just" need lkdi, > > a round of d-i binNMUs

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread dann frazier
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 05:39:21PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Phili

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 11:30 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: > > > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side [...] > Sorry, been trave

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-18 Thread dann frazier
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > Hi, > > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side > > We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the >

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-18 Thread Francesca Ciceri
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:13:53AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > > That should be read as "let's settle for Sep 29". > > > > I'm around with a press hat if needed. > Me too. Cheers, Francesca -- "You're scared of mice and

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-18 Thread Neil McGovern
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:59:09PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side > > We still need a pre

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 03:58:13PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side > We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the > announcement, f

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-17 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, ok, given the replies, let's settle on this: On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > * Sep 29/30: ok from RT side We still need a press officer for somewhen in the evening to send out the announcement, feedback from -live and a note from -kernel if there's still a cha

Re: Squeeze point release (6.0.6)

2012-09-14 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:43:03PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: >Hi, > >I'd like to arrange a point release to be done as soon as feasible. >So I'd like to propose a bunch of weekends here: > >* Sep 22/23: I'm personally busy on the 23th Available that weekend fine. >* Sep 29/30: ok from RT side A