Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-12-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Mehdi Dogguy, le Thu 16 Dec 2010 10:17:05 +0100, a écrit : > On 12/15/2010 07:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote: > > Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB, > >> still can't fit on just CD1. > > > > This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7 > > re

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-12-16 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/15/2010 07:02 PM, Joey Hess wrote: > Samuel Thibault wrote: >> - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB, >> still can't fit on just CD1. > > This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7 > reach testing. Should happen by monday, would appreciate any testing you >

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-12-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Joey Hess, le Wed 15 Dec 2010 14:02:38 -0400, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB, > > still can't fit on just CD1. > > This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7 > reach testing. Should happen by monday, would appreciate a

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-12-15 Thread Joey Hess
Samuel Thibault wrote: > - Gnome grew from 1830MiB to 2409MiB, > still can't fit on just CD1. This should fix itself once both tasksel 2.88 and gnome-core 1:2.30+7 reach testing. Should happen by monday, would appreciate any testing you can do. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description:

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-12-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
And here are the values for amd64: Samuel Thibault, le Wed 15 Dec 2010 02:34:00 +0100, a écrit : > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 27 Oct 2010 18:00:16 +0200, a écrit : > > - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB > > (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?, and since openssh-client recommends > > xauth, x1

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-12-14 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Here is an updated report on task size: Samuel Thibault, le Wed 27 Oct 2010 18:00:16 +0200, a écrit : > - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB > (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?, and since openssh-client recommends > xauth, x11 stuff gets installed) Still 492MiB. One nice thing is

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-11-01 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): > Christian PERRIER, le Mon 01 Nov 2010 12:03:51 +0100, a écrit : > > Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): > > > Hello, > > > > > > Actually, partman will even just refuse to setup partitions. > > > > Additionnall, a test today with beta1

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-11-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Christian PERRIER, le Mon 01 Nov 2010 12:03:51 +0100, a écrit : > Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): > > Hello, > > > > Actually, partman will even just refuse to setup partitions. > > Additionnall, a test today with beta1, on a 1GiB disk (virtual > machine) and the "separate home" p

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-11-01 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Friday 29 October 2010, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-10-29 11:58 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:36:59AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > >> Or, for a less drastic solution, use localepurge. Losing the > >> docs is a significant loss, you don't want to suffer that > >> un

Processed: Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 528914 serious Bug #528914 [partman-auto] Should leave enough space for two kernel flavours in the root partition Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-11-01 Thread Christian PERRIER
severity 528914 serious thanks Quoting Samuel Thibault (sthiba...@debian.org): > Hello, > > Actually, partman will even just refuse to setup partitions. Additionnall, a test today with beta1, on a 1GiB disk (virtual machine) and the "separate home" partman-auto recipe lead to failure because of

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 18:00:16 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > I forgot to mention other tasks as well: > > - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB > (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?, and since openssh-client recommends > xauth, x11 stuff gets installed) > fwiw db4.5 is (finally) out of

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-10-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 18:29:19 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Sven Joachim, le Wed 27 Oct 2010 18:16:43 +0200, a écrit : > > On 2010-10-27 17:20 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > /lib (except modules) 9276 14096 4820 (notably 3.6M > > > discover) > > > > Why does discover g

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-10-27 Thread Florian Weimer
* Samuel Thibault: > - Base+Standard grew from 397MiB to 491MiB > (we install libdb4.{5,6,7,8} !?, I suspect that this is caused primarily by API and ABI incompatibility, and in part by the lack of response to bug reports from upstream. Everybody who uses Berkeley DB extensively has once been

Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB

2010-10-27 Thread Stefan
Hm, maybe a wishlist item against d-i is in order? Something like "support tmpfs in partman" - original message - Subject: Re: Squeeze can't fit on 512MiB From: Samuel Thibault Date: 27/10/2010 17:11 Stefan, le Wed 27 Oct 2010 19:00:27 +0200, a écrit : > N