On Sunday 14 September 2008, Sebestyen Szabolcs wrote:
> Everything went well, the system installed without problems but when
> booting the fresh installed system GRUB gives the following error
> "Error 25" and the boot process stops.
> I cannot figure it out what is the problem, i have searched th
Jin Zhao wrote:
> Where are instructions for that in preseed install? I searched email
> lists and installer manual but all examples found so far use physical
> disk as partman examples. I also tried manually install and set up
> software raid, but the 'debconf-get-selections --installer' output
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 22 November 2004 11:12, KiNG HoMaH wrote:
> I installed Debian Sarge with this partitions:
>
> /dev/hda1 - /boot - ext2
> /dev/md0 - / - ReiserFS (Software RAID 0)
>
> When I configured Software RAID, Debian Installer showed a Dialog box
> te
On 10.V.2004 at 17:57 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> Hmm, maybe the libparted patch for LVM2 devices should be reverted
No, it fixes a bug in libparted.
> and they be created by hand?
If there is some need to do this it is possible. The script
init.d/parted from the package partman can b
* Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-10 19:54]:
> MD devices. You have two choices: 1. see why parted_devices doesn't
> work for MD (the bug is somewhere either in libparted or in the
> kernel)
It's a bug in libparted. While libparted finds (most) LVM1 devices,
it doesn't find LVM2 devi
On 10.V.2004 at 17:46 (+0200) Paul Fleischer wrote:
>
> Anton, could you explain how the lvm devices are added in the /v/l/p/devices
> directory? It looks like being part of the core partman system, but I can't
> really figure out what it is. Whatever it is, shouldn't it be picking up
> md-devi
On Saturday 08 May 2004 18:44, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> On 7.V.2004 at 00:48 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Ok, /lib/partman/initd.d/35dump hangs.
> >
> > /lib/partman/init.d/35dump: IN: DUMP =dev=md=0
> > parted_server: Read command: DUMP
> > parted_server: The device =dev=md=0 is not opened.
On 7.V.2004 at 00:48 (+0100) Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> Ok, /lib/partman/initd.d/35dump hangs.
>
> /lib/partman/init.d/35dump: IN: DUMP =dev=md=0
> parted_server: Read command: DUMP
> parted_server: The device =dev=md=0 is not opened.
> parted_server: Line 1087. CRITICAL ERROR!!! EXITING.
>
>
On Friday 07 May 2004 01:48, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Ok, /lib/partman/initd.d/35dump hangs.
>
> /lib/partman/init.d/35dump: IN: DUMP =dev=md=0
> parted_server: Read command: DUMP
> parted_server: The device =dev=md=0 is not opened.
> parted_server: Line 1087. CRITICAL ERROR!!! EXITING.
Ahh, yea
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:26:23AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:20:03AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> >
> > I thought it was behaviour by design. IIRC, the script explicitly grepped
> > out non-ok mirror devices.
>
> This was fixed in 0.1.63:
>
> * Add inactive MD con
* tbm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-05 23:56]:
> >and when I go back to partman, it hangs. Something's wrong here.
>
> It (repeatedly) hangs at 50%... unfortuantely, I don't have a virtual
...
> This is 100% repeatable. You don't even need any special devices.
> Just use 1 device for RAID, go
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:20:03AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
>
> I thought it was behaviour by design. IIRC, the script explicitly grepped
> out non-ok mirror devices.
This was fixed in 0.1.63:
* Add inactive MD constituent devices as well (closes: #238514).
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out!
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 07:59:19AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> 2) The initrd image generated by mkinitrd only activates the first md-device
> >> for some weird reason.
> >
> > mkinitrd is fussy, the mirror must be fully built and healthy to be us
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> 2) The initrd image generated by mkinitrd only activates the first md-device
>> for some weird reason.
>
> mkinitrd is fussy, the mirror must be fully built and healthy to be used.
It shouldn't be. It's meant to pick up whatever disks are listed i
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 07:35:38PM +0200, Paul Fleischer wrote:
> On Sunday 02 May 2004 03:16, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > Now that beta4 is out, what are your plans of getting mdcfg and
> > partman-md uploaded to get some testing?
>
> As I am not sure how to go about it, I have no p
David Whedon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:04:48PM -0600 wrote:
> > Has anyone been working on support for root software raid for the debian
> > installer yet?
> If your referring to debian-installer, the replacement for boot-floppies, I
> don't think anything has been do
Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:04:48PM -0600 wrote:
> Has anyone been working on support for root software raid for the debian
> installer yet?
If your referring to debian-installer, the replacement for boot-floppies, I
don't think anything has been done in that area. If you are referring to
boot-floppi
17 matches
Mail list logo
