On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:50:34PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:06:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:27:33PM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> > > > Gabriel Paubert said:
> > >
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:17:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:02:32PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:29:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:16:23PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > > > The MVME5500 is a completel
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:06:30PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:27:33PM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> > > Gabriel Paubert said:
> > > > I find it quite stupid to distinguish them from PreP only because
> >
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 06:02:32PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:29:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:16:23PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > > The MVME5500 is a completely different beast (it should be
> > > available now or soon), with a
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:35:37PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:27:33PM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> > Gabriel Paubert said:
> > > I find it quite stupid to distinguish them from PreP only because
> > > they have a different host bridge (Raven/Falcon/Hawk). This said
>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:29:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:16:23PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> > > Sven Luther said:
> > > > Could you test the prep kernel at :
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~luth
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:27:33PM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Gabriel Paubert said:
> > I find it quite stupid to distinguish them from PreP only because
> > they have a different host bridge (Raven/Falcon/Hawk). This said
> > I wrote my own bootloader for them which never made it to the
> > offic
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 03:59:24PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:05:40AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Keep adding. I'm just scetching from hear-say about powerpc.
> > >
> > > CD1 would also contain Amiga A
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:05:40AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Keep adding. I'm just scetching from hear-say about powerpc.
> >
> > CD1 would also contain Amiga APUS stuff I guess.
>
> Amiga APUS booting is in the same case as the BootX bootin
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Sven Luther said:
> > On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> >> Sven Luther said:
> >> > Could you test the prep kernel at :
> >> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.4.22, and instruct us about
> >> :
>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:16:23PM +0200, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> > Sven Luther said:
> > > Could you test the prep kernel at :
> > > http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.4.22, and instruct us about :
> > >
> > > 1) The differe
Gabriel Paubert said:
> I find it quite stupid to distinguish them from PreP only because
> they have a different host bridge (Raven/Falcon/Hawk). This said
> I wrote my own bootloader for them which never made it to the
> official tree for several reasons but mostly my fault (I'm very
> bad at pus
Sven Luther said:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
>> Sven Luther said:
>> > Could you test the prep kernel at :
>> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.4.22, and instruct us about
>> :
>> >
>> > 1) The different method of booting from a prep system.
>> >
>>
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Sven Luther said:
> > Could you test the prep kernel at :
> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.4.22, and instruct us about :
> >
> > 1) The different method of booting from a prep system.
> >
> > 2) if there are auto-booti
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 11:43:59AM +0100, Leigh Brown wrote:
> Sven Luther said:
> > Could you test the prep kernel at :
> > http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.4.22, and instruct us about :
> >
> > 1) The different method of booting from a prep system.
> >
> > 2) if there are auto-booti
Sven Luther said:
> Could you test the prep kernel at :
> http://people.debian.org/~luther/powerpc/2.4.22, and instruct us about :
>
> 1) The different method of booting from a prep system.
>
> 2) if there are auto-booting CDroms, or if you just have to enter the
> right value from the OF (in
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:38:29AM -0600, Erik Andersen wrote:
> On Mon Oct 06, 2003 at 08:45:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > I think bruckner is prep, that Joey (Martin Shulze) has one, as well as
> > Ole-Egil Hvitmyren, i think. I have asked Ole-Egil Hvitmyren also if he
> > could do an Amiga
On Mon Oct 06, 2003 at 08:45:24AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> I think bruckner is prep, that Joey (Martin Shulze) has one, as well as
> Ole-Egil Hvitmyren, i think. I have asked Ole-Egil Hvitmyren also if he
> could do an AmigaONE kernel package, but no response from him also on
> this subject.
I
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:26:42PM -0700, Chris Tillman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > prep : no idea, but the above method should do also.
> >
> > CD3 bootblock
> >
>
> I haven't heard from an
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 01:05:40AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Keep adding. I'm just scetching from hear-say about powerpc.
>
> CD1 would also contain Amiga APUS stuff I guess.
Amiga APUS booting is in the same case as the BootX booting on oldworld.
The apusboot/amiboot program is curren
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > prep : no idea, but the above method should do also.
>
> CD3 bootblock
>
I haven't heard from any prep people on this or the powerpc list for a
long time. If we don't have any u
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:09:15PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> >
> oldpmac miboot floppy install : needs one kernel floppy + miboot,
> initrd on one floppy also, but maybe a two phase installation (would
> need 3 floppies) as the initrd will not fit on one floppy.
Except, if we remove some
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > For powerpc, this would be :
> > >
> > > oldpmac miboot floppy install : needs one kernel floppy + miboot,
> > > initrd on one
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > For powerpc, this would be :
> >
> > oldpmac miboot floppy install : needs one kernel floppy + miboot,
> > initrd on one floppy also, but maybe a two phase installation (would
>
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For powerpc, this would be :
> >
> > oldpmac miboot floppy install : needs one kernel floppy + miboot,
> > initrd on one floppy also, but maybe a two phase installation (would
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For powerpc, this would be :
>
> oldpmac miboot floppy install : needs one kernel floppy + miboot,
> initrd on one floppy also, but maybe a two phase installation (would
> need 3 floppies) as the initrd will not fit on one floppy.
CD1/dists/sarge/m
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 07:34:01PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:18, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > > Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 14:38:
> > >
> > > > The image target (which builds a floppy image)
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:18, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 14:38:
> >
> > > The image target (which builds a floppy image) is not meaningfull for
> > > every arch and every boot method. That i386 emulates
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:18:05PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:18, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 14:38:
> >
> > > The image target (which builds a floppy image) is not meaningfull for
> > > every arch and every boot method.
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:18:05PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:18, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 14:38:
> >
> > > The image target (which builds a floppy image) is not meaningfull for
> > > every arch and every boot method.
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 16:18, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 14:38:
>
> > The image target (which builds a floppy image) is not meaningfull for
> > every arch and every boot method. That i386 emulates floppys for cd
> > booting is a special case, not a gene
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:38:50PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 09:46, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > on the way to a build system that enables us to use the current buildd
> > > infrastructur
Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Gaudenz Steinlin um 14:38:
> The image target (which builds a floppy image) is not meaningfull for
> every arch and every boot method. That i386 emulates floppys for cd
> booting is a special case, not a general way of booting from cds. So if
> we want to have a deb f
Gaudenz Steinlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 09:46, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > on the way to a build system that enables us to use the current buildd
> > > infrastructure for d-i images, I
On Sun, 2003-10-05 at 09:46, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > on the way to a build system that enables us to use the current buildd
> > infrastructure for d-i images, I checked in a preliminary proposal into
> > cvs.
> >
> > I
Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow um 12:14:
> I was going to put the images in the changes file with full path and
> fix the upload scripts to put the files there.
Yeah, that is another solution. But it is up to other poeple to decide
whether they like that or not.
Sebastian
--
Sebastian Ley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
>
> on the way to a build system that enables us to use the current buildd
> infrastructure for d-i images, I checked in a preliminary proposal into
> cvs.
Last we talked at the D-I debcamp in Oldenburg I offered to do this. I
was just waiting f
Am So, den 05.10.2003 schrieb Geert Stappers um 09:59:
> $ fakeroot debian_proposed/rules binary
> for TYPE in i386 ; do \
> make TYPE=$TYPE image ; \
> done
That won't work, as all scripts will try to access the files in debian
directiry nonetheless. You have to copy debian_proposed to d
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on the way to a build system that enables us to use the current buildd
> infrastructure for d-i images, I checked in a preliminary proposal into
> cvs.
>
> I placed it under build/debian_proposed because it discards most
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 03:31:03AM +0200, Sebastian Ley wrote:
> Hello,
>
> on the way to a build system that enables us to use the current buildd
> infrastructure for d-i images, I checked in a preliminary proposal into
> cvs.
>
> I placed it under build/debian_proposed because it discards most
40 matches
Mail list logo
