Re: Please unblock lvm2/2.02.39-6

2008-12-09 Thread Luk Claes
Bastian Blank wrote: > Hi folks > > Please unblock lvm2/2.02.39-6. unblocked Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Please unblock lvm2/2.02.39-6

2008-12-02 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > From quite far, this makes a lot of changes and, would I be in the .../... To make it clearer, this opinion is not, in any way, meant to be the D-I team's opinion. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please unblock lvm2/2.02.39-6

2008-12-02 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > From quite far, this makes a lot of changes and, would I be in the > > release team, I would feel quite uncomfortable allowing such changes > > to go in testing when seeing how they can hardly break systems. The > > "it breaks to much" comment is inde

Re: Please unblock lvm2/2.02.39-6

2008-12-02 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > So, -4 was triggering some RC bugs, such as #506536 and #506534. This > is fixed in -6 This happens for not-announced relations. > From quite far, this makes a lot of changes and, would I be in the > release team, I would feel q

Re: Please unblock lvm2/2.02.39-6

2008-11-29 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Bastian Blank ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi folks > > Please unblock lvm2/2.02.39-6. > > It introduces several bug fixes. Let's try to make the release team easier... That releases introduces the following changes, compared to the release in testing: lvm2 (2.02.39-3) unstable; urgency=lo