Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:56:00PM +0100, peter green wrote:
It would probably be interesting and useful for the X packaging
team to see
a diff between the config that was generated from configuring X and the
config you ultimately had to use to get X working. In my experien
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 11:56:00PM +0100, peter green wrote:
> > It would probably be interesting and useful for the X packaging
> > team to see
> > a diff between the config that was generated from configuring X and the
> > config you ultimately had to use to get X working. In my experience,
> > p
Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 03:01:45PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey folks,
Just some opinion about the sarge install process. I installed a july daily
build(I can't remember the exact one, but i think it was 25) on my computer
that has just the very common hardware(i386
> It would probably be interesting and useful for the X packaging
> team to see
> a diff between the config that was generated from configuring X and the
> config you ultimately had to use to get X working. In my experience,
> provided you give the X configuration the right input, it does a
> reaso
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 03:01:45PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Just some opinion about the sarge install process. I installed a july daily
> build(I can't remember the exact one, but i think it was 25) on my computer
> that has just the very common hardware(i386 arch) with
5 matches
Mail list logo
