On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:18:59AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:47:01 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > It's been no secret that the 2.4 kernel was not in good shape and hppa
> > folk were happier with 2.6. But this idea of just dropping 2.4
> > altogether was a supr
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:47:01 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
[...]
>
> It's been no secret that the 2.4 kernel was not in good shape and hppa
> folk were happier with 2.6. But this idea of just dropping 2.4
> altogether was a suprise to me.
>
> (FWIW, I'm also concerned that the kernel team (except for j
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:47:01AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I'm not even sure that hppa installs are really well tested, by the
> > way. Joey could tell more and this probably needs more input from him.
> > He may even correct me if I'm completely wrong.
> So all I c
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Unfortunately, and as far as I can tell, there hasn't been much
> activity and interaction with the d-i team about this. So, it turns
> out that the 2.6/installer combination is very likely to be nearly
> untested. Having hppa installs be really tested was already a
> cha
4 matches
Mail list logo
