Re: D-I switched to dhcp3-client

2007-07-15 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 14-07-2007 om 22:11 schreef Frans Pop: > On Saturday 14 July 2007 20:18, Robert Millan wrote: > > You might be interested in: > > http://www.netbsd.org/contrib/soc-projects.html#tiny-dhcp > > > > I don't know the current status, but it might be worth keeping an eye > > on. > > Thanks. I've ad

Re: D-I switched to dhcp3-client

2007-07-14 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 14 July 2007 20:18, Robert Millan wrote: > You might be interested in: > http://www.netbsd.org/contrib/soc-projects.html#tiny-dhcp > > I don't know the current status, but it might be worth keeping an eye > on. Thanks. I've added a link to that on http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstall

Re: D-I switched to dhcp3-client

2007-07-14 Thread Robert Millan
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > We do still plan to keep looking for a smaller alternative. You might be interested in: http://www.netbsd.org/contrib/soc-projects.html#tiny-dhcp I don't know the current status, but it might be worth keeping an eye on. -- Rober

Re: D-I switched to dhcp3-client

2007-07-13 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 13 July 2007 21:41, Steve Langasek wrote: > In the meantime the maintainers can now file a removal request for the > 'dhcp' package, right? :) In theory, yes. But I'd prefer waiting until we know there are no regressions and all the changes in D-I have reached testing. pgp2sbY92NwXQ.p

Re: D-I switched to dhcp3-client

2007-07-13 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 14, 2007 at 05:30:41AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > Joey and I have switched over D-I to use the dhcp3-client udeb yesterday. > > We'll do some basic testing over the next few days, but if you don't hear > > from us you

Re: D-I switched to dhcp3-client

2007-07-13 Thread Andrew Pollock
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:59:37PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Joey and I have switched over D-I to use the dhcp3-client udeb yesterday. > We'll do some basic testing over the next few days, but if you don't hear > from us you can assume things are working OK. Excellent. > We do