Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers (2021-06-17):
> On 20-05-2021 17:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > If that's fine for the release team, I'd be happy to have the package in
> > unstable so that can be tested via daily builds of the installer (they
> > pull udebs from unstable). I'm not sure how much testing tho
Hi kibi,
On 20-05-2021 17:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> If that's fine for the release team, I'd be happy to have the package in
> unstable so that can be tested via daily builds of the installer (they
> pull udebs from unstable). I'm not sure how much testing those daily
> builds get from people r
Control: tags -1 = confirmed d-i
Hi Theodore,
Sorry it took so long.
On 20-05-2021 19:40, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> That patch is rather long, but it's all mostly of the form:
>
> - tail = (struct ext4_fc_tail *)ext4_fc_tag_val(tl);
> + memcpy(&tail, ext4_fc_tag_val(tl), sizeof(tail));
Theodore Y. Ts'o (2021-05-20):
> The real world corner cases are if you are using a 32-bit arm binary
> on a 64-bit binary, and if you are using a sparc64 system (not an
> officially supported Debian arch). I'm not sure if misaligned pointer
> accesses are allowed in arm-32 kernel code, but it's
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:55:34PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Paul Gevers (2021-05-20):
> > On 20-05-2021 00:11, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> >
> > Unfortunately, there was no release.debian.org bug to track this. Due
> > to the current high volume to our list, this fell from the radar. To
> >
Hi Ted,
Paul Gevers (2021-05-20):
> On 20-05-2021 00:11, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> > Ping to the debian-release bug.
>
> Unfortunately, there was no release.debian.org bug to track this. Due
> to the current high volume to our list, this fell from the radar. To
> avoid this I now generate a pre
6 matches
Mail list logo
