Hi Adam--
On Tue 2018-10-23 16:18:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Sure, but that's not what I said. My distinction was between including
> the gnupg update in the point release versus pushing it more urgently
> via stable-updates. I never implied the updates shouldn't be released at
> all.
On Tue 2018-10-23 20:00:06 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> From discussions elsewhere, I understand that the "raw" upstream
> enigmail - i.e. installed via upstream's addons service - is actually
> already compatible with the new Thunderbird version, and the problem
> only affects the Debian packag
On Tue, 2018-10-23 at 10:35 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> The fact that the upstream-supported version of enigmail that works
> with the upcoming stretch version of thunderbird depends on these
> fixes is, as you say, another reason to suggest inclusion in debian
> stretch.
>From discussions
On 2018-10-23 15:35, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases!
I just wanted to clarify a few points here.
On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for
stable-updates a
Thanks to Adam for your ongoing work on the stable releases!
I just wanted to clarify a few points here.
On Tue 2018-10-23 08:57:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> An issue is that the gnupg update itself doesn't really qualify for
> stable-updates any more than it qualifies for stable-security.
5 matches
Mail list logo
