On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 08:24:08PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:49:59AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 09:45 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>>> one option that doesn't seem to have been considered would be to create
>>> a separate package (let's call it
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:49:59AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
>On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 09:45 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
>> one option that doesn't seem to have been considered would be to create
>> a separate package (let's call it UEFIx) that installs an UEFI binary to
>> EFI/boot/bootx64.efi. Tha
On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 09:45 +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> one option that doesn't seem to have been considered would be to create
> a separate package (let's call it UEFIx) that installs an UEFI binary to
> EFI/boot/bootx64.efi. That binary could then do what the UEFI BIOS
> should've done (i.e. l
3 matches
Mail list logo
