Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 22 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > M... looks like I was too conservative... Let's try to demote these > to suggests once the current version hits testing. Cool. Thanks Mike. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 01:28:32PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 22 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Could you send the output for reportbug --template xulrunner-1.9.1 on > > your machine ? > > -- System Information: > Debian Release: squeeze/sid > APT prefers unstable > APT policy:

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 22 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > Could you send the output for reportbug --template xulrunner-1.9.1 on > your machine ? -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-68

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 12:33:12PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Monday 22 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:47:44AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > I guess for the icon issue you mean #561902? I don't see any problem > > > with the search engine dropdown list without li

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:47:44AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > clone 570579 -1 > reassign -1 tasksel 2.81 > retitle -1 iceweasel is no longer a desktop environment independent browser > thanks > > (Fairly full quote because of CCs.) > > Thanks a lot for your detailed reply Mike. > > On Saturday 20

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-22 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 22 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:47:44AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > I guess for the icon issue you mean #561902? I don't see any problem > > with the search engine dropdown list without libgnomeui-0 installed > > under KDE. > > No, I mean a different issu

Processed: Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 570579 -1 Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages Bug 570579 cloned as bug 570905. > reassign -1 tasksel 2.81 Bug #570905 [xulrunner] xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages Bug reassigned

Re: Bug#570579: xulrunner: please reconsider recommends for GNOME packages

2010-02-21 Thread Frans Pop
clone 570579 -1 reassign -1 tasksel 2.81 retitle -1 iceweasel is no longer a desktop environment independent browser thanks (Fairly full quote because of CCs.) Thanks a lot for your detailed reply Mike. On Saturday 20 February 2010, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 10:18:09PM +0100,