On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 11:50:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> The device was listed in d-i because people were using it. This thread is
> here because they can no longer do so. It's rather rude of you to declare
> that it's ok for the kernel team to "fix" usability issues in the installer
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:32:44PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
>
> It would be great if also eth1394 would reappear in the new stack,
> especially since the original developer is an @debian.org person.
>
you seem to have a strange confidence in someone, whose stack went
so badly down the roa
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:01:40PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> > What discussion? I googled for it and after skimming through about 20 pages
> > I still have not found it. What I _did_ find is several other reports of
> > problems with the new stack, two of which complain about missing Eth
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:01:40PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
> eth1394 is missing that is by far the less used firewire driver.
But for some people the driver used early in the installation (where a
kernel rebuild is not very convenient).
> the switch to the juju stack allowed to clo
On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007, you wrote:
> > the new stack is very promising,
> > we will reconsider later if no eth1394 shows up,
> > for now that's just a minor regression.
>
> No, that is not a "minor" regression. Half the functionality of the old
> dri
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 05:21:36PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hmm. One more try. Let's check the mailing list for June. Ah, a hit!
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2007/06/msg00079.html
>
> No discussion though (at least, I don't usually call a single message a
> discussion). Not all
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (Moving thread to cloned BR.)
>
> On Thursday 15 November 2007, you wrote:
>> the new stack is very promising,
>> we will reconsider later if no eth1394 shows up,
>> for now that's just a minor regression.
>
> No, that is not a "minor" regression. Half the f
(Moving thread to cloned BR.)
On Thursday 15 November 2007, you wrote:
> the new stack is very promising,
> we will reconsider later if no eth1394 shows up,
> for now that's just a minor regression.
No, that is not a "minor" regression. Half the functionality of the old
drivers is missing!
> se
8 matches
Mail list logo
