retitle 370098 epiphany isn't installed by the default installation
severity 370098 important
thanks
Le lundi 05 juin 2006 à 23:29 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> Le dimanche 04 juin 2006 à 16:01 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > No. Both epiphany and galeon depend o
Christian Perrier wrote:
> > It doesn't make sense to install it as part of the GNOME desktop. It
> > doesn't integrate correctly with the desktop, and doesn't have any key
> > features epiphany doesn't have. In the end, it's just confusing to have
> > two browsers installed, just because one of th
> It doesn't make sense to install it as part of the GNOME desktop. It
> doesn't integrate correctly with the desktop, and doesn't have any key
> features epiphany doesn't have. In the end, it's just confusing to have
> two browsers installed, just because one of them is "well-known".
Actually, i
Le dimanche 04 juin 2006 à 16:01 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > No. Both epiphany and galeon depend on libxul, not firefox. Something
> > else must have brought firefox.
>
> The desktop task pulls in firefox.
>
> > As galeon is more compliant with the GNOME HIG than fire
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> No. Both epiphany and galeon depend on libxul, not firefox. Something
> else must have brought firefox.
The desktop task pulls in firefox.
> As galeon is more compliant with the GNOME HIG than firefox, it makes
> sense to give it a higher priority than firefox. The probl
Le samedi 03 juin 2006 à 13:32 -0700, Eduardo Silva a écrit :
> > Eduardo Silva wrote:
> > > The Desktop Environment task installs galeon and
> > firefox, but I don't
> > > understand why. Why both?
> > The gnome-desktop-environment depends on
> > epiphany-browser (>= 1.8.5) | galeon (>= 1.3.1 8)
6 matches
Mail list logo
