Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote:
> > > - Is is ok to have bootloaders for i386 listed but not for others?
> > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > neither.
>
> Anyway, this boot load
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Thiemo Seufer]
> >> Yes, until recently debootstrap installed lilo.
> >
> > AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> > have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
>
> No, the changes wasn't done for all archs. But
[Thiemo Seufer]
>> Yes, until recently debootstrap installed lilo.
>
> AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
No, the changes wasn't done for all archs. But I believe it _should_
be done for all ar
Joey Hess wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> > have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
>
> As far as I can tell it was only for i386. alpha, ia64,
> m68k, powerpc, sparc, mipsel, hppa, all still have
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> AFAIK this change was for all architectures. So all bootloaders will
> have to be added explicitly now (for their relevant architecture).
As far as I can tell it was only for i386. alpha, ia64,
m68k, powerpc, sparc, mipsel, hppa, all still have boot loaders listed
in deboot
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 09:34:13PM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > > > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > > > neither.
> > >
> > >
Joey Hess wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > > neither.
> >
> > Didn't this change recently (or was that only for cdebootstrap)?
>
> Yes, un
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> > tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> > neither.
>
> Didn't this change recently (or was that only for cdebootstrap)?
Yes, until recently debootstrap installe
> > - Is is ok to have bootloaders for i386 listed but not for others?
> I think that most bootloaders are pulled in by debootstrap, so appear on
> tasks/base-sarge. lilo and grub are an exception as debootstrap installs
> neither.
Anyway, this boot loaders should only be listed in the i386 arch,
Joey Hess wrote:
> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > When adding the kernel/bootloader packages for mips/mipsel in
> > debian-cd I found some probably arch-dependent packages were on
> > this list unconditionally. The appended patch is my best guess
> > about it, but I'm not sure about some issues:
> >
> >
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> When adding the kernel/bootloader packages for mips/mipsel in
> debian-cd I found some probably arch-dependent packages were on
> this list unconditionally. The appended patch is my best guess
> about it, but I'm not sure about some issues:
>
> - Is discover actually needed
11 matches
Mail list logo
