Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-25 Thread Richard Hirst
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote: > I'd like to disable this section for the boot-floppies, it's not > necessary there: > > if [ -n "$USE_BOOTFLOPPIES_INTERACTION" ]; then > mknod -m 600 $TARGET/dev/initctl p > cat <$TARGET/dev/initctl >/dev/null &

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-24 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 09:06:17AM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote: > I object. We should fix, rather than disable, it. Could you > please try the following code instead? Sorry, I won't have access to the s390 systems until Monday so I can't do this now. I have uploaded the NMU for i386 and s390 to in

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:36:37PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote: > > > I'll make this change in my NMU which fixes the s390 problems. > > Testing with current CVS boot-floppies on s390 shows that this section > does not work. It causes

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-24 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 04:21:28PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote: > if [ -n "$USE_BOOTFLOPPIES_INTERACTION" ]; then ^^ Sorry, this must be -z, of course. -- Stefan Gybas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-24 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 01:36:37PM +0100, Stefan Gybas wrote: > I'll make this change in my NMU which fixes the s390 problems. Testing with current CVS boot-floppies on s390 shows that this section does not work. It causes dbootstrap to hang after calling debootstrap (maybe because the cat proce

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-24 Thread Stefan Gybas
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 10:17:11PM -0700, Erik Andersen wrote: > Umm. Why not teach debootstrap to use mknod instead? > There is no good reason for debootstrap to need mkfifo, I'll make this change in my NMU which fixes the s390 problems. -- Stefan Gybas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-23 Thread Erik Andersen
On Thu Jan 24, 2002 at 03:57:42PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > > > Umm. Why not teach debootstrap to use mknod instead? > > There is no good reason for debootstrap to need mkfifo, > > If mknod is already available, then please reassig

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-23 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit: > Umm. Why not teach debootstrap to use mknod instead? > There is no good reason for debootstrap to need mkfifo, If mknod is already available, then please reassign the bug to debootstrap. So, does "mknod p" work like "mkfifo" ? regard

Re: 3.0.19 show-stoppers

2002-01-23 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Jan 23, 2002 at 01:34:22AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > Well, ok. I did some testing, and we're not quite ready to release > 3.0.19. > > First of all, there is #130482: We need mkfifo enabled in busybox to > make the latest debootstrap happy. Umm. Why not teach debootstrap to use mkno