Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Thanks for the clue on downloading with apt.
>
> > This is from my apt-get based baseX_X.tgz builder. It's not quite ready
> > yet(apt gets an internal error very near the end)
>
> Do you have one base builder, and Anthony Towns
Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thanks for the clue on downloading with apt.
> This is from my apt-get based baseX_X.tgz builder. It's not quite ready
> yet(apt gets an internal error very near the end)
Do you have one base builder, and Anthony Towns has another? Why this
forked effort
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Joey Hess wrote:
> > the apt-get way of downloading is *not* going to work for us. It
> > refuses to download Required packages that are already installed. Feh!!!
>
> Have you tried setting Dir::State::status to point to an empty file or
> something?
Fyi, apt is perfe
On Mon Jan 29, 2001 at 12:10:23AM -0800, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
> Module name: boot-floppies
> Changes by: aph 01/01/29 00:10:23
>
> Modified files:
> . : Tag: woody rootdisk.sh
>
> Log message:
> get half-way through root-buildi
> the apt-get way of downloading is *not* going to work for us. It
> refuses to download Required packages that are already installed. Feh!!!
Have you tried setting Dir::State::status to point to an empty file or
something?
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Sun Jan 28, 2001 at 10:59:28AM -0800, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
> Module name: boot-floppies
> Changes by: aph 01/01/28 10:59:28
>
> Modified files:
> scripts/rootdisk: Tag: woody EXTRACT_LIST_all
> SMALL_BASE_LIST_all
Am Saturday, January 13, 2001 um 11:13:48 PM, schrieb Debian Boot List :
> CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
> Module name: boot-floppies
> Changes by: aph 01/01/13 23:13:48
>
> Modified files:
> documentation/pt: dbootstrap.sgml
>
> Log message:
> fix tagging error
>
>
> --
> To
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 06:54:33PM +0200, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:02:25PM -0800, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> > more missing \n's
>
> Please tell me the minimal build I can execute to get error messages
> from missing or extra \n's. I really would like to commit only
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 06:54:33PM +0200 , Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:02:25PM -0800, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> > CVSROOT:/cvs/debian-boot
> > Module name:boot-floppies
> > Changes by: aph 00/12/06 21:02:25
> >
> > Modified files:
> > utilities/dbo
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 09:02:25PM -0800, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
> Module name: boot-floppies
> Changes by: aph 00/12/06 21:02:25
>
> Modified files:
> utilities/dbootstrap/po: fi.po
>
> Log message:
> more missing \n's
Please tell me the mi
** Original Message **
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SENT: Sat 12/02/2000 6:33 AM
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUBJECT: Debian Boot CVS: aph
>
>
>
>CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
>
>Module name: boot-floppies
>
>Changes by:aph 00/12/01 15:30:02
>
>
>
>Modified files:
>
> debian
** Original Message **
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SENT: Sat 12/02/2000 6:32 AM
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUBJECT: Debian Boot CVS: aph
>
>
>
>CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
>
>Module name: boot-floppies
>
>Changes by:aph 00/12/01 15:22:23
>
>
>
>Modified files:
>
> .
** Original Message **
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SENT: Sun 12/03/2000 1:42 AM
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUBJECT: Debian Boot CVS: aph
>
>
>
>CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
>
>Module name: boot-floppies
>
>Changes by:aph 00/12/02 10:28:34
>
>
>
>Modified files:
>
> utilities/d
** Original Message **
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SENT: Thu 11/30/2000 10:00 PM
TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SUBJECT: Debian Boot CVS: aph
>
>
>
>CVSROOT: /cvs/debian-boot
>
>Module name: boot-floppies
>
>Changes by:aph 00/11/30 06:57:21
>
>
>
>Modified files:
>
> utilities/
Glenn wrote:
> Split main to seperate function, goal is to make libudpg.
> Removed dependence on shell command rm with internal function.
> replaced "struct packages_t" with "packages_t" via typdef (for style).
This grew the binary by 2k. I hope that's worth it, but I have my
doubts. If we just u
Michael Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, so you want people to download that huge boot-floppies in case they just
> want a custom version of boot floppies without language chooser at all?
Sure, why not. This is intended to be standard on two i386 vanilla
flavors and pretty much any n
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 08:12:49PM +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
> They are no more independent. This will be going mainstream
> really soon now, and the build process depends on them. Adam
> agreed with me that it is a good idea to have that in utilities
> in order to make a good source package.
Michael Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why? It was agreed that bf-utf stuff should be in the same directory where
> boot-floppies sources are; that these modules are independent and there is no
> reason to merge them...
There is reason to merge them, because as of a day or so or now, yo
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue Nov 14, 2000 at 12:59:25PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > > For example, (I'll pick on tausq since he is in the boot-floppies passwd file)
> > > for tausq, there is an entry in passwd, which is being mapped to aph. But tausq
> >
> > actually t
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 11:46:21PM +0300, Michael Sobolev wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:03:03PM -0800, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > Update of /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities/bf-utf
> > In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv8721/bf-utf
> >
> > Log Message:
> > Directory /cvs/debian-boot/boo
On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 12:03:03PM -0800, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Update of /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities/bf-utf
> In directory klecker:/tmp/cvs-serv8721/bf-utf
>
> Log Message:
> Directory /cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/utilities/bf-utf added to the repository
Why? It was agreed that
On Tue Nov 14, 2000 at 12:59:25PM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > For example, (I'll pick on tausq since he is in the boot-floppies passwd file)
> > for tausq, there is an entry in passwd, which is being mapped to aph. But tausq
>
> actually this is a bad example. i was added to the passwd file
Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon Nov 13, 2000 at 11:02:53PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > > BTW, there's something wrong with the scripts where they are saying
> > > all the changes are by me, which is wrong.
> >
> > I'll bet it's people committing with t
> For example, (I'll pick on tausq since he is in the boot-floppies passwd file)
> for tausq, there is an entry in passwd, which is being mapped to aph. But tausq
actually this is a bad example. i was added to the passwd file by one of
the debian admins because i was having issues with ssh one we
On Mon Nov 13, 2000 at 11:02:53PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > BTW, there's something wrong with the scripts where they are saying
> > all the changes are by me, which is wrong.
>
> I'll bet it's people committing with the pserver all come out as you,
> since the commits act
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > BTW, there's something wrong with the scripts where they are saying
> > all the changes are by me, which is wrong.
>
> I'll bet it's people committing with the pserver all come out as you,
> since the commits actally happen as you.
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> BTW, there's something wrong with the scripts where they are saying
> all the changes are by me, which is wrong.
I'll bet it's people committing with the pserver all come out as you,
since the commits actally happen as you. My couple of commits today
correctly showed they w
BTW, there's something wrong with the scripts where they are saying
all the changes are by me, which is wrong.
--
.Adam Di [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.onShore.com/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
28 matches
Mail list logo
