Hi,
On Thursday 10 July 2008 21:51, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> That's what Per did originally, but I recommended against it because
> it's only needed on a single sub-arch. I said that it could be added
> to kernel-wedge once other arches actually need it. YMMV.
I'd like to see it on i386 as wel
(No need to CC me, I read the list.)
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2008, Per Andersson wrote:
>> Attached patch adds support for jffs2-modules to d-i.
>
> No, sorry. This is not how this is done.
I have submitted patches to debian-boo
* Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-10 18:06]:
> 1) Patches are normally submitted through the BTS. Discussion/questions
> and maybe review of rough, proposed patches beforehand is done on the
> mailing list.
The patch was discussed off-list (not ideal, but certainly better than
how most patc
On Thursday 10 July 2008, Per Andersson wrote:
> Attached patch adds support for jffs2-modules to d-i.
No, sorry. This is not how this is done.
1) Patches are normally submitted through the BTS. Discussion/questions
and maybe review of rough, proposed patches beforehand is done on the
mailing l
"Per Andersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi!
>
> Attached patch adds support for jffs2-modules to d-i.
The patch itself is fine however parted doesn't has support for
it. How is it going to be used inside of d-i?
--
O T A V I OS A L V A D O R
---
5 matches
Mail list logo
