Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration

Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Holger Wansing (2015-03-22): > > is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be > > converted into an entity? > > Your change looks like a good idea to me. This has already been committed. Thanks Holger -- ===

Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration

Holger Wansing (2015-03-22): > is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be > converted into an entity? Your change looks like a good idea to me. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:49AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:51:11PM +, peter green wrote: > > On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: > > >Hi, > > > > > >is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be > > >converted into an entity? > > >Wo

Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration

On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:51:11PM +, peter green wrote: > On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: > >Hi, > > > >is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be > >converted into an entity? > >Would ease the repeating changing. > > > >Patch attached, works for both xml a

Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration

Hi, Am So. Mär. 22 17:51:11 2015 GMT+0100 schrieb peter green: > On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be > > converted into an entity? > > Would ease the repeating changing. > > > > Patch attached, works for bo

Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration

On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: Hi, is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Would ease the repeating changing. Patch attached, works for both xml and po based translations. Correct me if I'm wrong here but shouldn't the copyr