Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-05 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 11:07:55PM +, Miguel Figueiredo wrote: > A Tuesday 04 March 2008 17:44:22, Jérémy Bobbio escreveu: > > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:06:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > [...] > > > I strongly disagree. It took m

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-04 Thread Miguel Figueiredo
A Tuesday 04 March 2008 17:44:22, Jérémy Bobbio escreveu: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:06:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: [...] > I strongly disagree. It took me more than a full day to produce this > "changelog" after reviewing more than 14

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > >> I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release > >> announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually > >> meant to be

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: >> I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release >> announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually >> meant to be a part of i

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-04 Thread Geert Stappers
Op 04-03-2008 om 15:23 schreef Otavio Salvador: > Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release > > announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually > > meant to be a part of it, as a simple, human-readable compi

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-04 Thread Frans Pop
On Tuesday 04 March 2008, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > I do agree that the current draft does not look like a release > announcement. But the document I had initially written was actually > meant to be a part of it, as a simple, human-readable compilations of > the various changes in the installer since

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-04 Thread Otavio Salvador
Jérémy Bobbio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:06:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: >> On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> > Please take a look at current Release Announce[1] draft. It has some >> > XXX strings that need to be fixed and also general improvem

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-04 Thread Jérémy Bobbio
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 08:06:56PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > Please take a look at current Release Announce[1] draft. It has some > > XXX strings that need to be fixed and also general improvement. > > I've finally taken a look at the "draf

Re: [RFR] Release Announce draft at wiki

2008-03-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 13 February 2008, Otavio Salvador wrote: > Please take a look at current Release Announce[1] draft. It has some > XXX strings that need to be fixed and also general improvement. I've finally taken a look at the "draft", but IMO it's *far* from ready. The main problems with the curren