Stephen R Marenka writes:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:08:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't
>> > you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the m
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:08:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't
> > you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive
> > would reject beca
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't
> you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive
> would reject because it doesn't know about m68k?
Yes, indeed. We can upload to debian-por
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:29:36AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:05:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Wouter Verhelst writes:
> > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > >> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> > >> > vm
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:05:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> >> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> > [...]
> >> The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porte
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> [...]
>> The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters:
> [...]
>> > vmelilo-installer
>
> vmelilo-installer is specific to a rat
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
[...]
> The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters:
[...]
> > vmelilo-installer
vmelilo-installer is specific to a rather rare m68k subarch. It should
not b
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> Packages that has translation-only or really trivial changes
>
I worked on those today. After all, many of them had no upload since
September 2008 and thus has numerous translation updates.
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
> Remaining:
>
> > > libdebian-installer
>
> I know there's a trick to build it...:-)...but needs to find it again.
Uploaded
>
> > > localechooser
>
> I need to ponder whether I include the parts that are part of
> console-setup switch. I thin
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> > Packages that looks OK for upload
> > ~
I uploaded:
> > partconf
> > partman-auto
> > partman-auto-lvm
(those yesterday)
> > partman-crypto
> > partman-ext3
> > partman-jfs
> > partman-md
> > partman-partitioning
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello folks,
Here goes the updated list with the still missed packages. Since first
message a total of 34 packages were upload and I'd like to thank people
who worked on it.
Please take a look on the remaining packages and process them if you're
the
talking to myself again...
> Luk Claes wrote...
> > Feel free to test with the version in proposed-updates to really make
> > sure it's fixed.
>
> I'm not completely sure how to do this. From what I can gather from [1]
> I need to build my own installer image, which I'll have a go at.
> I initial
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> > Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please?
> > And that it actually works?
> > I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks.
>
> Well, reopening was strange as a fixed version was in proposed
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
> Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please?
> And that it actually works?
> I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks.
Well, reopening was strange as a fixed version was in proposed-updates
at that time, though as there are no CD i
Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please?
And that it actually works?
I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks.
See also #532840, which might be related.
Hopefully this can be sorted out before 5.0.2 goes out.
Thanks
Vince
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
More uploads done:
> main-menu
> mdcfg
> mountmedia
> nobootloader
> partconf
> partman-auto
> partman-auto-lvm
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> main-menu
The following changes are afar from trivial:
* After the debconf priority was lowered because of an error, return to the
default priority in one step when next a component runs successfully.
* Instead of lowering the debconf pri
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> Packages that looks OK for upload
> ~
>
I uploaded a few, namely:
> apt-setup
> auto-install
> clock-setup
> finish-install
> installation-report
> iso-scan
> kickseed
> lilo-installer
> lowmem
signature.asc
Desc
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> [...]
> > To make it clear: grub-installer changes should not have been
> > mentioned in my mail. "Trivial changes" above do *only* apply to
> > installation-report
Hello Christian,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
> To make it clear: grub-installer changes should not have been
> mentioned in my mail. "Trivial changes" above do *only* apply to
> installation-report that was following grub-installer in Otavio's
> list.
Are you go
Quoting Felix Zielcke (fziel...@z-51.de):
> > > grub-installer
> >
> > Trivial changes
>
> What about my patch for grub-installer I sent yesterday?
> Can this be included in the next upload or would it be better to wait?
> Otavio already said on IRC that it's okay for him but I should wait for
>
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 07:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Perrier:
> > Packages that looks OK for upload
> > ~
> > grub-installer
>
> Trivial changes
What about my patch for grub-installer I sent yesterday?
Can this be included in the next upload or would it be be
> Packages that looks OK for upload
> ~
I had a look down to iso-scan
>
> apt-setup
Has trivial changes (merge from Ubuntu which we can assume safely tested)
> auto-install
The changes there are longstanding ones by Phil Hands:
* check for dhcp preseed
Hello Christian,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> PS: one should notice that, if we validate these changes, we could
> soon drop a few hacks we currently have in finish-install and
> unconditionnally install console-setup fo
Hello Martin,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Otavio Salvador [2009-06-06 18:31]:
>> Packages that looks OK for upload
>> ~
>
> I uploaded the following packages:
>
>> arcboot-installer
>> colo-installer
>> nobootloader
>> sibyl-installe
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
> localechooser
I have pending changes for the console-setup switch (patch attached),
which are basically aimed at installing c-s on the target system in
*all* cases where we were previously configuring the console with kbd
and kbd console fonts.
The
* Otavio Salvador [2009-06-06 18:31]:
> Packages that looks OK for upload
> ~
I uploaded the following packages:
> arcboot-installer
> colo-installer
> nobootloader
> sibyl-installer
These need some attention:
> linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6
> linux-kernel-di-mipsel-
27 matches
Mail list logo
