Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:36:52AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hm. It seems that you are right. I noticed the 2.2.18 per se was > missing, ran 'grep-available' to check for other packages, and only > 2.2.17 came up, I don't know why. Going through the lists apt > downloaded by hand reveal

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread james
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:19:08AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > I assume you're talking woody here? I've been working on potato boot > floppies for the past week steadily and not had time to look at the > woody set. Yes. > > - config: Changed default powerpc kernel version to 2.2.17. >

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
I assume you're talking woody here? I've been working on potato boot floppies for the past week steadily and not had time to look at the woody set. On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:12:55AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I got a build that ran all the way up to release.sh before failing > to install

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread james
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 01:15:37AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Braino there -- 'pmac' should be 'powerpc' in powermac.rules. Sorry. ^^^ 'powerpc.rules'. argh. ~~ -- James Deikun, Techie(tm), CSI Multimedia The opinions expressed

Re: [PATCH] nearly successful powerpc build

2001-04-13 Thread james
Braino there -- 'pmac' should be 'powerpc' in powermac.rules. Sorry. -- James Deikun, Techie(tm), CSI Multimedia The opinions expressed &c. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]