Re: RW for one-time install.

2003-02-11 Thread Tim Dijkstra
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003 18:21:36 -0700 "Chris Tillman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:41:13AM -0500, James Woollen wrote: > > > why do you recommend the CD-RW for a one-time install. i will be > > installing on an older machine that i anticipate will have issues > > (at least

Re: RW for one-time install.

2003-02-10 Thread Chris Tillman
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:41:13AM -0500, James Woollen wrote: > why do you recommend the CD-RW for a one-time install. i will be > installing on an older machine that i anticipate will have issues (at > least potentially more) dealing with an RW vs an R. i don't see any reference to CD-RW in the

Re: RW for one-time install.

2003-02-10 Thread Andrew Gorcester
It's just because it's a waste to use a CD-R for a one-time install, and discard it afterwards. There's no technical reason to use a CD-RW - if a CD-R works better for you, use it. -Andrew On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, James Woollen wrote: > dear sir: > > > > why do you recommend the CD-RW for a one-ti

RW for one-time install.

2003-02-10 Thread James Woollen
dear sir:   why do you recommend the CD-RW for a one-time install. i will be installing on an older machine that i anticipate will have issues (at least potentially more) dealing with an RW vs an R.   please advise.   regards, james  woollen