On Thursday 28 September 2006 21:19, Max Vozeler wrote:
> So, based on (I think) all feedback received, I created a first
> package of this kind in /people/xam/kernel/; It includes only
> loop-aes-modules for now but can be extended to also handle other
> modules in a simple way once the need arise
Hi all,
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 06:40:55PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> In the in between time (for arches that have already switched
> to the new kernel), part of the functionality of the installer
> will be unavailable. Seems acceptable though.
I think so too. I'll need to check that e.g. partman
Sorry for not really responding to this earlier. I've been somewhat
distracted by the GR nonsense going on...
I saw the conversation with Joey on IRC yesterday, and I think my comments
below are in line with that.
On Sunday 24 September 2006 19:04, Max Vozeler wrote:
> Some possible approaches
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 25 September 2006 18:30, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> It'll be separately. linux-modules-extra uses -source package
>> to build the binary and when doing it, we would build the need udeb
>> together.
>
> No. You _cannot_ build udebs from the same sour
On Monday 25 September 2006 18:30, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> It'll be separately. linux-modules-extra uses -source package
> to build the binary and when doing it, we would build the need udeb
> together.
No. You _cannot_ build udebs from the same source package as regular
binaries.
That is the w
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Monday 25 September 2006 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>> Why not just add support to mark a module supporting d-i udebs and
>> teach linux-modules-extra-2.6 to build them. That would allow us to
>> have just one point to change/improve/fix for them.
>
>
On Monday 25 September 2006 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Why not just add support to mark a module supporting d-i udebs and
> teach linux-modules-extra-2.6 to build them. That would allow us to
> have just one point to change/improve/fix for them.
No. That solution has severe D-I release manage
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 03:28:52PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Monday 25 September 2006 14:55, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> > Why not just add support to mark a module supporting d-i udebs and
> > teach linux-modules-extra-2.6 to build them. That would allow us to
> > have just one point to change/imp
Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Approach 1: Building module udebs in linux-kernel-di-*
<...>
> About the delay: It could be reduced by including all modules
> in linux-modules-extra-2.6, which is automatically updated
> whenever a new kernel version/ABI gets uploaded.
Why not just
Hi all,
I'm trying to find a good solution for building udebs of
out-of-tree linux kernel modules. What I'm currently doing is
build them from the same source package as normal module
packages, but that approach has some problems [1].
Some possible approaches have come out of discussions during
10 matches
Mail list logo
