Op 26-04-2007 om 06:48 schreef Frans Pop:
> On Wednesday 25 April 2007 23:51, peter green wrote:
> > unfortunately it still seems to be backed up out of testing by a
> > missing build-dep on gcc-4.2 :)
>
> I would not expect testing to be really usable to build the installer for
> quite some time
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 23:51, peter green wrote:
> unfortunately it still seems to be backed up out of testing by a
> missing build-dep on gcc-4.2 :)
I would not expect testing to be really usable to build the installer for
quite some time.
pgp0d5VLcAtGN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> -Original Message-
> From: Geert Stappers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 April 2007 22:15
> To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: nano-udeb: Depends: libc6 (>= 2.5)
>
>
> Op 21-04-2007 om 16:40 schreef Frans Pop:
> > On Saturday 21
Op 21-04-2007 om 16:40 schreef Frans Pop:
> On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:13, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > When is libc 2.5 expected to arrive?
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=glibc
It did arrive:-)
Cheers
Geert Stappers
( telling the readers of the list archive that
On Saturday 21 April 2007 09:13, Geert Stappers wrote:
> When is libc 2.5 expected to arrive?
http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?p=glibc
> Is there in the meantime a workaround?
No.
pgpf12QrWkboA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Op 20-04-2007 om 23:12 schreef Frans Pop:
> On Friday 20 April 2007 22:55, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > What to do to get it fixed?
>
> Wait until version 2.5 of libc becomes available
> and upgrade your build system to it
When is libc 2.5 expected to arrive?
Is there in the meantime a workaround?
On Friday 20 April 2007 22:55, Geert Stappers wrote:
> What to do to get it fixed?
Wait until version 2.5 of libc becomes available and upgrade your build
system to it obviously.
pgpVSdn3X62Lk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
7 matches
Mail list logo