Petter Reinholdtsen schrieb:
I suspect it will be easier with bochs, as qemu is missing a feature.
bochs can use the 'term' console driver, and then use normal stdin and
stdout as the console. This console would be easy to control using
expect.
Sounds interesting for test automation.
Since a few
[Colin Watson]
> Wouldn't it be much easier to pre-seed the debconf database so that the
> questions aren't asked in the first place?
Depends on the purpose. If the point is to install automatically,
yes. If the point is to test the installation, no. :)
For qemu/bochs installs, the latter make
>> Is not very clear to me how to interact with d-I via qemu.
>
>I suspect it will be easier with bochs, as qemu is missing a
>feature.
Do you know if is in the whishlist of future qemu releases?
>bochs can use the 'term' console driver, and then use
>normal stdin and stdout as the console. T
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 10:44:35AM +0200, Viti Davide wrote:
> I'd like to play with expect in order to drive an automatic
> installation;
Wouldn't it be much easier to pre-seed the debconf database so that the
questions aren't asked in the first place?
--
Colin Watson
[Viti Davide]
> Is not very clear to me how to interact with d-I via qemu.
I suspect it will be easier with bochs, as qemu is missing a feature.
bochs can use the 'term' console driver, and then use normal stdin and
stdout as the console. This console would be easy to control using
expect. You w
5 matches
Mail list logo