Good morning
I was visting your website on 3/9/2016 and I'm very interested.
I'm currently looking for work either full time or as a intern to get experience
in the field.
Please review my CV and let me know what you think.
Yours respectfully,
--
Janina Brayley
Resume.doc
Description: MS-Word
Hey
I was visting your website on 1/29/2016 and I'm very interested.
I'm currently looking for work either full time or as a intern to get experience
in the field.
Please review my CV and let me know what you think.
In sympathy,
--
Birgit Ramdas
Resume.rtf
Description: MS-Word document
On Friday 17 March 2006 01:17, Randall Wayth wrote:
> The output of prtconf is attached. I've also attached a chunk of the
> syslog which shows the ethernet cards. This particular system (for
> reasons unknown to me- it was a hand-me-down) has about 7 ethernet
> ports and a dozen scsi interfaces. O
Hi Frans,
The output of prtconf is attached. I've also attached a chunk of the
syslog which shows the ethernet cards. This particular system (for
reasons unknown to me- it was a hand-me-down) has about 7 ethernet ports
and a dozen scsi interfaces. One bunch of ethernet ports is a group of
4-
On Thursday 16 March 2006 03:07, Randall Wayth wrote:
> OK, I grabbed the latest (March 14th) etch network installer from the
> link location below. I ran the installer with debconf/priority=medium
> as requested. The CDROM detection worked, as did detection of the
> sunhme (happy meal) network car
Hi Frans,
OK, I grabbed the latest (March 14th) etch network installer from the
link location below. I ran the installer with debconf/priority=medium as
requested. The CDROM detection worked, as did detection of the sunhme
(happy meal) network cards. There was one non-fatal error: during the
On Monday 27 February 2006 04:21, Randall Wayth wrote:
> To get to this point, I had also tried the latest etch cd installer
> which uses a 2.6 kernel. This installer failed at other points (I had
> to modprobe esp and it couldn't mount the disk after partitioning, and
> something else too...) but
Hi Jim and Frans,
Thanks very much for the follow-up and suggestions. For the sake of
creating a useful record I'll let you know what happened here.
I ended up getting this working using the standard sarge minimal-cd net
installer, which was the thing that failed in the first place. To get it
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 12:18:59PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> SunBlade 100 systems are notorious though. I tried installing one at a
> developers meeting recently and ran into the weirdest problems which were
> not even consistently reproducible. I did succeed in installing from CD
> some times,
On Friday 24 February 2006 03:52, Randall Wayth wrote:
> Thanks for this info. I actually tried the latest etch cd yesterday but
> it failed also (to mount the CD) even though it seems to explicity
> handle SCSI cdrom devices. (At least one gets that impression from the
> messages that come up that
Hi Frans,
Thanks for this info. I actually tried the latest etch cd yesterday but
it failed also (to mount the CD) even though it seems to explicity
handle SCSI cdrom devices. (At least one gets that impression from the
messages that come up that it does.) So I wonder now exactly what the
pro
On Thursday 23 February 2006 06:53, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > One of the replies to this bug mentions using a 2.6 kernel. Is that
> > via netboot only, or can I get a cdrom version?
>
> You can do it by typing "linux26" at the boot prompt. I hope this is
> true also for the sparc architecture...
> One of the replies to this bug mentions using a 2.6 kernel. Is that via
> netboot only, or can I get a cdrom version?
You can do it by typing "linux26" at the boot prompt. I hope this is
true also for the sparc architecture...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
I've just been trying to install sarge from cdrom on a Sun Enterprise
4000 and have the same error mentioned in this bug. The problem in this
case seems to be that the cdrom in this machine is a SCSI cdrom, not
ide. Is this indeed the same problem? Doing a net boot is difficult for
me, so
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:54:25AM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
> I guess you missed my point... I wasn't looking for a "fix"... I was
> asking if it was slated for addition...
It probably isn't, but you could of course file a wishlist bug against
busybox-udeb. (We already have space problems, so
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
cut -c 1-512 /dev/zero | head -5 > /dev/hda
Blah, sorry, that won't work, of course, unless you're fond of having all
0x0a on your disks. :-)
/* Steinar */
I guess you missed my point... I wa
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 06:40:38PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> cut -c 1-512 /dev/zero | head -5 > /dev/hda
Blah, sorry, that won't work, of course, unless you're fond of having all
0x0a on your disks. :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:33:31AM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
> True, but we like to specify the number of blocks:
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda count=5 bs=512
>
> This only takes about 5 secs to run and clears the MBR as well as wipes
> enough off the front of the platter to let us crea
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:23:14AM -0800, Stuart Sheldon wrote:
> I'm running beta2 of the installer on one of our install mirrors at the
> office, we (re)install an average of 10 - 15 sarge systems a month as
> part of our testing and review for our customer base. Needless to say,
> installing
First off, hat's off to the debian-installer developers... You folks
have done a great job!
I'm running beta2 of the installer on one of our install mirrors at the
office, we (re)install an average of 10 - 15 sarge systems a month as
part of our testing and review for our customer base. Needles
On 21 Jan 2002 21:25:49 +
Philip Blundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The font reduction process needs to run under a UTF-8 locale. It
> doesn't much matter which one; en_IN.UTF-8 was just a random choice.
Thankye kindly, I thought as much but I wanted to be certain.
--
.--=-=-=-=
On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 21:08, David B Harris wrote:
> I hope this doesn't bother anybody, but I was curious as to why
> en_IN.UTF8 was required to build boot-floppies? I don't mind at all, but
> somebody has been bugging me about it. Grr.
>
> Is it just so that there's a UTF8 locale generated, or
I hope this doesn't bother anybody, but I was curious as to why
en_IN.UTF8 was required to build boot-floppies? I don't mind at all, but
somebody has been bugging me about it. Grr.
Is it just so that there's a UTF8 locale generated, or somesuch?
Thanks in advance.
--
.--=-=-=-=
23 matches
Mail list logo
