Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes

2010-02-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
Frans Pop writes: > On Monday 22 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote: >> This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in >> unstable. >> >> On Monday 22 February 2010, Archive Administrator wrote: >> > netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost >> >> This should *nev

Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes

2010-02-21 Thread Otavio Salvador
Hello, On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 11:33 PM, Frans Pop wrote: > This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in unstable. > I noticed it after I uploaded, see the other mail I sent to the ml. If Bastian cannot upload busybox tomorrow I can upload it or a new netcfg adding dhcp3-cl

Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes

2010-02-21 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 22 February 2010, Frans Pop wrote: > This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in > unstable. > > On Monday 22 February 2010, Archive Administrator wrote: > > netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost > > This should *never* have been uploaded before

Re: Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes

2010-02-21 Thread Frans Pop
This is brilliant. You've just seriously broken installations in unstable. On Monday 22 February 2010, Archive Administrator wrote: > netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost This should *never* have been uploaded before a new busybox, because the busybox dhcp client does not

Processing of netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes

2010-02-21 Thread Archive Administrator
netcfg_1.52_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_1.52.dsc netcfg_1.52.tar.gz netcfg_1.52_amd64.udeb netcfg-static_1.52_amd64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ries.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bo