Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-08 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, December 8, 2006 10:31, Loïc Minier said: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2006, David Härdeman wrote: >> Don't mix up boot-on-raid and boot-on-device-mapper, they are two >> different things using different kernel subsystems (md and dm). > > Err, md is dm based, right? Nope, see http://lwn.net/Articles

Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-08 Thread David Härdeman
On Fri, December 8, 2006 4:12, Daniel Burrows said: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was > heard to say: >> some trivia first: >> - Debian's lilo is patched with an unofficial patch for device-mapper >>support which was not updated since mid 2005 >>

Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-08 Thread Loïc Minier
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006, David Härdeman wrote: > Don't mix up boot-on-raid and boot-on-device-mapper, they are two > different things using different kernel subsystems (md and dm). Err, md is dm based, right? You mean boot on LVM versus boot on MD? Or did you mean dmraid which is yet something el

Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-07 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 07:12:41PM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Lo?c Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was > heard to say: > > some trivia first: > > - Debian's lilo is patched with an unofficial patch for device-mapper > >support which was not updated si

Re: Previously working LVM setup mysteriously broken.

2006-12-07 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 09:33:33AM +0100, Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > some trivia first: > - Debian's lilo is patched with an unofficial patch for device-mapper >support which was not updated since mid 2005 > - Debian just hits the problem, but it seems to be a commo